|
|
Post by Pilch on Oct 20, 2022 13:39:48 GMT 1
quick you need to learn a new name to hound out, looks like you've been left on the starting line |
|
|
|
Post by staffordshrew on Oct 20, 2022 13:47:43 GMT 1
quick you need to learn a new name to hound out, looks like you've been left on the starting line Perhaps you don't remember that my posts on the candidate that I thought would be the "right" choice was always Penny Mordaunt?
I don't care if the Tory party want to rip themselves apart, but, currently, they are in charge of the country and the last few weeks have close to turned us into an IMF basket case and made us a laughing stock throughout the world.
You can see that, can't you?
|
|
|
|
Post by scooter on Oct 20, 2022 13:49:04 GMT 1
quick you need to learn a new name to hound out, looks like you've been left on the starting line The only people doing the hounding are the Tory party MP’s and members. They just keep cocking it up |
|
kp
Midland League Division One
Posts: 495
|
Post by kp on Oct 20, 2022 13:51:37 GMT 1
Again, everyone can see what you have Pilch. Maybe refrain from posting until you do have something? Just a thought, something else you should try perhaps? stilll nothing ...... So it seems... |
|
kp
Midland League Division One
Posts: 495
|
Post by kp on Oct 20, 2022 13:52:52 GMT 1
There's that irritating little noise again while the grown ups are discussing the future of our Prime Minister. here's where that annoying little noise originated, 'kind of made a rod for his own back without even realising it was happening'  Yeah, you really got me there...I take it your condition prevents you from realising when you have been 'owned'... |
|
kp
Midland League Division One
Posts: 495
|
Post by kp on Oct 20, 2022 13:53:28 GMT 1
Sometimes one should not continue to repeat something one feels was a trivial comment, so as to appear "normal". really, ok, I was about to start 6 more threads saying the same thing, I won't bother now, maybe we could have another one about the tories instead, not had one since yesterday Still nothing I see... |
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Oct 20, 2022 13:53:32 GMT 1
quick you need to learn a new name to hound out, looks like you've been left on the starting line Perhaps you don't remember that my posts on the candidate that I thought would be the "right" choice was always Penny Mordaunt?
I don't care if the Tory party want to rip themselves apart, but, currently, they are in charge of the country and the last few weeks have close to turned us into an IMF basket case and made us a laughing stock throughout the world.
You can see that, can't you?
between you are me, I can see that, then again I didn't vote them in, I can also see that that the previous government went a step further and killed over a million innocent people after a hunch that was incorrect, that party should have been disbanded there and then and yet strangly most people on this site think the sun shines out of their arses and want them back in You can't see that, can you? |
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Oct 20, 2022 13:55:20 GMT 1
really, ok, I was about to start 6 more threads saying the same thing, I won't bother now, maybe we could have another one about the tories instead, not had one since yesterday Still nothing I see... do you think it would be more exciting if they use black or white smoke to reveal the next PM ? |
|
kp
Midland League Division One
Posts: 495
|
Post by kp on Oct 20, 2022 13:56:36 GMT 1
do you think it would be more exciting if they use black or white smoke to reveal the next PM ? Still nothing... |
|
|
|
Post by frankwellshrews on Oct 20, 2022 13:56:52 GMT 1
quick you need to learn a new name to hound out, looks like you've been left on the starting line The only people doing the hounding are the Tory party MP’s and members. They just keep cocking it up Exactly. I don't remember being asked to vote on any of this. |
|
|
|
Post by staffordshrew on Oct 20, 2022 13:58:22 GMT 1
Perhaps you don't remember that my posts on the candidate that I thought would be the "right" choice was always Penny Mordaunt? I don't care if the Tory party want to rip themselves apart, but, currently, they are in charge of the country and the last few weeks have close to turned us into an IMF basket case and made us a laughing stock throughout the world. You can see that, can't you?
between you are me, I can see that, then again I didn't vote them in, I can also see that that the previous government went a step further and killed over a million innocent people after a hunch that was incorrect, that party should have been disbanded there and then and yet strangly most people on this site think the sun shines out of their arses and want them back in You can't see that, can you? The name may be the same, but the've gone through going left and back to centre since then. Labour have changed far more than doing a simple name change. |
|
|
|
Post by staffordshrew on Oct 20, 2022 14:03:07 GMT 1
Wow you are sharp, watch you don't cut yourself... Who knew that the chairman of the 1922 committee and the leader of the conservative party having a meeting has nothing to do with Labour? It's a good job Pilch is here... still nothing......................... Something?
A disjointed party running the country. Yet another Conservative PM?
No, still nothing.... new.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Oct 20, 2022 14:45:50 GMT 1
still nothing
( ****ing easy this game , I hit the ground running with it)
|
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Oct 20, 2022 14:50:22 GMT 1
between you are me, I can see that, then again I didn't vote them in, I can also see that that the previous government went a step further and killed over a million innocent people after a hunch that was incorrect, that party should have been disbanded there and then and yet strangly most people on this site think the sun shines out of their arses and want them back in You can't see that, can you? The name may be the same, but the've gone through going left and back to centre since then. Labour have changed far more than doing a simple name change. you mean they are now NEW NEW Labour ? |
|
|
|
Post by martinshrew on Oct 20, 2022 17:51:20 GMT 1
So, taking your metaphor and running with it, Ricketts would be Liz Truss. You could end up being her only defender too!! 😉 funny that you mention Ricketts. glad I didn't  this is my whole point, you and the whole Labour Party are making one hell of a rod for your own backs, making a drama out of everything like most did with Ricketts and then having to make excuses for the same thing happening under a new leader is not going to be something confined to blue and amber, the majority of the country are going to be playing it if and when starmer gets in charge, this can't be good for the economy, not in the slightest. I find it totally cringe and this new game is going to kill politics if it hasn't already Difference is Cotterill has us 8th not 24th; I doubt at this stage Labour will make such a big difference. |
|
|
|
Post by Worthingshrew on Oct 20, 2022 18:05:07 GMT 1
Again, everyone can see what you have Pilch. Maybe refrain from posting until you do have something? Just a thought, something else you should try perhaps? stilll nothing ...... Ffs give it a rest, you bore the pants of most of us on here. |
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Oct 20, 2022 18:13:52 GMT 1
Ffs give it a rest, you bore the pants of most of us on here. how about b******s, just because I wasn't singing from the same hymn sheet and got blanked off with ( still nothing ) doesn't mean I can't play the same 'bore the pants off game' as you lot, get used to it |
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Oct 21, 2022 13:17:01 GMT 1
got something 😝
concerns the MP for chester( rhymes with molester )
|
|
|
|
Post by staffordshrew on Oct 23, 2022 15:00:16 GMT 1
Suella Braverman? Whatever happened to her? Liz Truss, toast. Thérèse Coffey, probably toast. Depending on who gets to be PM for the next month or two, Nadine Dorres probably toast. The only thing that can save their careers is the total lack of alternatives available. No doubt Rees-Mogg will get a ministerial post no matter who though - he's so good at spinning the "truth".
|
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Oct 23, 2022 15:12:23 GMT 1
blimey, the other threads can't be going to plan if you've had to drag this one up
|
|
|
|
Post by staffordshrew on Oct 25, 2022 18:27:02 GMT 1
Suella Braverman back! Seems her error wasn't something to resign over after all.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Oct 25, 2022 18:32:44 GMT 1
Suella Braverman back! Seems her error wasn't something to resign over after all. that was obvious at the time |
|
|
|
Post by Worthingshrew on Oct 25, 2022 20:50:44 GMT 1
Suella Braverman back! Seems her error wasn't something to resign over after all. that was obvious at the time Terrible decision! Seems you can break the ministerial code with impunity, no doubt Boris will be arguing this. Plus, she’s to the right of Priti Patel apparently, which is some feat. Thought Rishi’s claims to govern with integrity would last a bit longer.... |
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Oct 25, 2022 23:01:02 GMT 1
that was obvious at the time Terrible decision! Seems you can break the ministerial code with impunity, no doubt Boris will be arguing this. Plus, she’s to the right of Priti Patel apparently, which is some feat. Thought Rishi’s claims to govern with integrity would last a bit longer.... what are you thoughts on labour getting back in after the shambles of the iraq war ? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 25, 2022 23:13:41 GMT 1
The dodgy dealings of politics, Braverman had to be rewarded for her public backing of Sunak over Johnson. It’s Sunak’s most controversial cabinet appointment, and the one that the media and opposition have focused on as it seems to go against his ‘integrity and accountability’ speech outside number ten from only hours earlier.
|
|
|
|
Post by shrewder on Oct 26, 2022 9:03:28 GMT 1
As a neutral don't see a problem. I believe her indiscretion was at a relatively minor level and was contrived to bring about Truss's downfall. You could see through it right from the time Braverman resigned.
|
|
|
|
Post by davycrockett on Oct 26, 2022 9:06:15 GMT 1
Terrible decision! Seems you can break the ministerial code with impunity, no doubt Boris will be arguing this. Plus, she’s to the right of Priti Patel apparently, which is some feat. Thought Rishi’s claims to govern with integrity would last a bit longer.... what are you thoughts on labour getting back in after the shambles of the iraq war ? Was going to mention last time you bought it up. Forgetting the rights and wrongs of the war the decision was put to parliament. Public generally were against the war but the vote was interesting…. Labour ….For 254 Against 84 Abstained 69 62% of Labour MPs voted for the war Tories ….For 146 Against 2 Abstained 17 88% of Tory MPs voted for the war Lib Dems For. 0 Against 52 Abstained 1 0% of Lib Dems voted for the war Lib Dems we’re the only party against the war Although Blair took us to war and rightly received the blame (he was PM) it was fully supported by the Tories, in-fact they would have stopped the war by voting against. |
|
|
|
Post by ssshrew on Oct 26, 2022 9:43:06 GMT 1
As a neutral don't see a problem. I believe her indiscretion was at a relatively minor level and was contrived to bring about Truss's downfall. You could see through it right from the time Braverman resigned. That upset more than the indiscretion to be honest. Dirty dealings afoot. I agree Truss was t good but it was the Tory system that put her there. If I were Rishi, I’d be very very wary of all the back benchers who are, for reasons best known to themselves and for which I can’t imagine, still wanting Johnson. |
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Oct 26, 2022 10:00:52 GMT 1
what are you thoughts on labour getting back in after the shambles of the iraq war ? Was going to mention last time you bought it up. Forgetting the rights and wrongs of the war the decision was put to parliament. Public generally were against the war but the vote was interesting…. Labour ….For 254 Against 84 Abstained 69 62% of Labour MPs voted for the war Tories ….For 146 Against 2 Abstained 17 88% of Tory MPs voted for the war Lib Dems For. 0 Against 52 Abstained 1 0% of Lib Dems voted for the war Lib Dems we’re the only party against the war Although Blair took us to war and rightly received the blame (he was PM) it was fully supported by the Tories, in-fact they would have stopped the war by voting against. that's why i don't vote tory that's why i don't vote labour that why i ask those who don't vote tory why they vote labour the penny is finally dropping |
|
|
|
Post by staffordshrew on Oct 26, 2022 10:15:56 GMT 1
Was going to mention last time you bought it up. Forgetting the rights and wrongs of the war the decision was put to parliament. Public generally were against the war but the vote was interesting…. Labour ….For 254 Against 84 Abstained 69 62% of Labour MPs voted for the war Tories ….For 146 Against 2 Abstained 17 88% of Tory MPs voted for the war Lib Dems For. 0 Against 52 Abstained 1 0% of Lib Dems voted for the war Lib Dems we’re the only party against the war Although Blair took us to war and rightly received the blame (he was PM) it was fully supported by the Tories, in-fact they would have stopped the war by voting against. that's why i don't vote tory that's why i don't vote labour that why i ask those who don't vote tory why they vote labour the penny is finally dropping Except that you tell us you don't vote at all? Are the Lib Dems not to your taste either?
Lib Dem votes might help Danny K have the smile wiped off his face - and that's not anti-Tory, a rough guide seems to be that some Tory voters over there are not happy with him representing them. Your vote is important.
|
|
