VAR again

[Dancin]

Well for those who think Liverpool get the rub of green with VAR, they have just been screwed over?!

[South Stand Salopian]

Offiside for me, here it is:

[Pilch]

Apr 10, 2021 16:16:30 GMT 1 South Stand Salopian said:

Offiside for me, here it is:

View Attachment

even his shadow is offside and he's crouching lower down that the villa player 

[welshdan]

Apr 10, 2021 16:23:50 GMT 1 Pilch said:

Apr 10, 2021 16:16:30 GMT 1 South Stand Salopian said:

Offiside for me, here it is:

View Attachment

even his shadow is offside and he's crouching lower down that the villa player 

It wouldn’t surprise me if VAR did start using shadows to give offside.

[Pilch]

Apr 10, 2021 16:32:13 GMT 1 welshdan said:

Apr 10, 2021 16:23:50 GMT 1 Pilch said:

even his shadow is offside and he's crouching lower down that the villa player 

It wouldn’t surprise me if VAR did start using shadows to give offside.

mo salah has won several penalties after being pushed over by shadows 

[ShrewsburySTFC]

VAR has confirmed players can now kick people in the head.

[Pilch]

Apr 11, 2021 13:13:20 GMT 1 ShrewsburySTFC said:

VAR has confirmed players can now kick people in the head.

shocking

[welshdan]

I’m far from the biggest united fan and don’t usually mind a laugh at their expense but the decision to cancel out the goal v Spurs is showing VAR has gone beyond.

It’s not stopping inconsistency it’s just changing it. Football decisions are so subjective the technology isn’t helping refs and they are damned if they do overturn and damned if they don’t.

[Pilch]

Apr 11, 2021 17:39:26 GMT 1 welshdan said:

I’m far from the biggest united fan and don’t usually mind a laugh at their expense but the decision to cancel out the goal v Spurs is showing VAR has gone beyond.

It’s not stopping inconsistency it’s just changing it. Football decisions are so subjective the technology isn’t helping refs and they are damned if they do overturn and damned if they don’t.

they deemed it accidental but gave a free kick ?,  that doesn't make sense

never heard a side squeal and play act  as much as spurs,  embarrassing 
although after the game at old Trafford it was probably their main game plan

[South Stand Salopian]

Apr 11, 2021 17:39:26 GMT 1 welshdan said:

I’m far from the biggest united fan and don’t usually mind a laugh at their expense but the decision to cancel out the goal v Spurs is showing VAR has gone beyond.

It’s not stopping inconsistency it’s just changing it. Football decisions are so subjective the technology isn’t helping refs and they are damned if they do overturn and damned if they don’t.

Wasn’t too dissimilar to what Aurier did to Rashford about 5 mins earlier. Difference was it was thay one was in the penalty area.

Referee on the pitch = inconsistent
VAR = inconsistent

[chirkshrew]

Aye, games gone soft, good job son wasnt playing in the seventies/ eighties----- would of been laughed off the pitch---- SHOCKING

[Pilch]

Apr 11, 2021 19:32:22 GMT 1 chirkshrew said:

Aye, games gone soft, good job son wasnt playing in the seventies/ eighties----- would of been laughed off the pitch---- SHOCKING

listening to the pundits and united players, I think he was laughed off the pitch

[chirkshrew]

Yes, hope he was

[Deleted]

Liverpool, Man Utd and Wolves all getting screwed over by the VAR in the same weekend surely blows any conspiracy theories that it favours certain teams.

[Pilch]

Apr 11, 2021 20:38:07 GMT 1 @feedoknasher said:

Liverpool, Man Utd and Wolves all getting screwed over by the VAR in the same weekend surely blows any conspiracy theories that it favours certain teams.

Nice try but Liverpool didn’t , they had a player offside
Or did you mean var screwed them by not gifting them a penalty for nothing ? 😜

[Deleted]

Apr 10, 2021 16:16:30 GMT 1 South Stand Salopian said:

Offiside for me, here it is:

View Attachment

Just looking at that picture it makes me wonder if there is contact between the two players and one is pushing the other into an offside position. Not a deliberate shove, but just enough of a nudge to give them a couple of inches.

[welshdan]

Apr 11, 2021 21:04:13 GMT 1 Pilch said:

Apr 11, 2021 20:38:07 GMT 1 @feedoknasher said:

Liverpool, Man Utd and Wolves all getting screwed over by the VAR in the same weekend surely blows any conspiracy theories that it favours certain teams.

Nice try but Liverpool didn’t , they had a player offside
Or did you mean var screwed them by not gifting them a penalty for nothing ? 😜

And that’s why VAR will never solve anything.

In both situations the attackers arm is marginally ahead of the defenders knee.

In one wolves are screwed over in the other the player is “clearly offside”.

In football the person making the judgement is influenced by the shirt the player is wearing.
Whether it’s refs or VAR the team the decision goes for or against is more influential than the facts.

Still makes for a never ending debate 😁

[South Stand Salopian]

And so it continues, Sky Sports have confirmed VAR officially couldn’t draw the lines properly so the on field decision stood despite the Southampton players heel playing playing him onside.

VAR HAS FAILED YET AGAIN!!!

[Pilch]

looks fractionally off to me, I think they should wear green boots and socks ;-)

[South Stand Salopian]

Apr 12, 2021 18:37:24 GMT 1 Pilch said:

looks fractionally off to me, I think they should wear green boots and socks ;-)

Ok, it’s close but the Southampton players heel was the furthest back part of the body not his toes that are on the ground where the only line was drawn. Point is why on earth could they unable to draw both the lines? What excuse is there? Let’s see what they say at half time.

[Pilch]

Apr 12, 2021 18:44:00 GMT 1 South Stand Salopian said:

Apr 12, 2021 18:37:24 GMT 1 Pilch said:

looks fractionally off to me, I think they should wear green boots and socks ;-)

Ok, it’s close but the Southampton players heel was the furthest back part of the body not his toes that are on the ground where the only line was drawn. Point is why on earth could they unable to draw both the lines? What excuse is there? Let’s see what they say at half time.

they clearly should have the line where is ankle is but I still think he is an inch offside,  even if he's level he's off

[chirkshrew]

Just off me thinks

[South Stand Salopian]

So the other West Brom player was blocking the view of the line - kind of fair enough but I feel it’s onside. Could they not have the technology to do it from both sides? VAR should’ve made a call rather than automatically sticking with the on field decision. Jamie Carragher Definitely thought it was onside and the others seemed to think it too.

[Pilch]

maybe its just me but I cant see that hes onside

Attachments:

[chirkshrew]

No, you are right, the west brom lads foot is offside, that's what I saw

[Pilch]

Apr 12, 2021 19:55:48 GMT 1 chirkshrew said:

No, you are right, the west brom lads foot is offside, that's what I saw

the top of his arm is even more offside than his foot

[South Stand Salopian]

Apr 12, 2021 19:43:01 GMT 1 Pilch said:

maybe its just me but I cant see that hes onside

The no.5 Bartley wasn’t the player who had the goal disallowed, it’s his body that’s blocking the line as I’ve referred to above. It was Diagne who had the goal disallowed but they couldn’t see where the furthest part of his body was. I still insist it’s onside 👍

[welshdan]

Apr 12, 2021 20:17:22 GMT 1 South Stand Salopian said:

Apr 12, 2021 19:43:01 GMT 1 Pilch said:

maybe its just me but I cant see that hes onside

The no.5 Bartley wasn’t the player who had the goal disallowed, it’s his body that’s blocking the line as I’ve referred to above. It was Diagne who had the goal disallowed but they couldn’t see where the furthest part of his body was. I still insist it’s onside 👍

If ignoring the number 5 then other player does look onside.

However still always find it odd that player in 6 yard box isn’t interfering with play. Technically he doesn’t get involved but as a defender you move out to catch someone offside so it affects your movement and thinking even if they don’t go on to get involved in the play.

[Pilch]

Apr 12, 2021 20:17:22 GMT 1 South Stand Salopian said:

Apr 12, 2021 19:43:01 GMT 1 Pilch said:

maybe its just me but I cant see that hes onside

The no.5 Bartley wasn’t the player who had the goal disallowed, it’s his body that’s blocking the line as I’ve referred to above. It was Diagne who had the goal disallowed but they couldn’t see where the furthest part of his body was. I still insist it’s onside 👍

oh im with you know,  I thought you were winding me up and the pundits had gone mental
pilch var took 2 hours but reached the correct decision ;-)

[chirkshrew]

But bartley is interfering with play and active in the area , gorra be offside, but dunno where the **** I am with these rules!!!!