Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2011 15:33:14 GMT 1
Geoff, In response to your reply on the previous thread, where this would not look right, thought I would take some time to reply to a few of your comments. Paul “Mr. Respect” Downward calling me a ‘little c***’ at the age of thirteen and I wasn’t even bothered then, let alone now. - Well that was many years ago now, and to be honest, cannot remember the incident, but believe you are now in your early 20's, which could indicate that with age, I have matured!! something you have yet to experience, however, if I did say that to you & I have no reason not to believe you, I humbley apologise, It is a phrase I still use, generally towards my son, and 99,9% of the time in gest!! however if you feel that it is a reason tohold a grudge, well so be it!! I however do note that you admit to ‘standing when the game got exciting’ which clearly flouts the ground regulations you spent months attempting to justify. Some would call you a hypocrite, but I myself think you’re a passionate fan - This is a selective use of terms that I have used, if you resaerch everything I have always said, I have stated all along that moments of standing are allowed, especially during times og "High Excitement" and if you were to clamp down on that you would be fighting a losing battle. this is completely different to persistant standing, which is where I have been placing my side and perspective. You also mentioned a cpl of weeks ago about how I had predicted ground closures et al over persistant standing. I again clear up what I said and the context it was said in. I stated that with the problems that STFC have with th e local authority, that reduction in crowd numbers and fines were all possible sanctions that could be imposed upon the club if it was seen for us to have a crowd that was uncompliant with ground regulations. You just have to listen to Beacon Radio in the last 2 months to see that those options can be implimented and Wolves have indead been threated recently about it!! but the long and the short of it is simple, when asked to sit by stewards, its best for the club if you do it, I personally know the Safety Officer at STFC, and he will not risk his staff getting into confrontations with fans for nio good reason. If you are going to quote what I have said, it would be nice for it to be accurate. Cheers
|
|
|
Post by Ned on May 10, 2011 16:22:45 GMT 1
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2011 16:26:01 GMT 1
Thanks, I would suggest not!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2011 16:26:30 GMT 1
I bet the first thing crippen does is point out that it should read "FAO" not "FOA".
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2011 16:27:41 GMT 1
I bet the first thing crippen does is point out that it should read "FAO" not "FOA". Thats my education wasted!! ;D ;D ;D
|
|
|
Post by Ned on May 10, 2011 16:27:55 GMT 1
Thanks, I would suggest not!! Why? This is clearly an ongoing matter between you two, that's what the PM service is for.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2011 16:44:21 GMT 1
Thanks, I would suggest not!! Why? This is clearly an ongoing matter between you two, that's what the PM service is for. Dont read it then!!
|
|
|
Post by Feedo Gnasher on May 10, 2011 16:48:11 GMT 1
I don't mind seeing dirty linen being aired in public
|
|
|
Post by Mike on May 10, 2011 16:48:45 GMT 1
Oh dear. Why couldn't this have gone in the 10 page thread ongoing.
Merge it mods.
|
|
|
Post by Hippo on May 10, 2011 16:54:31 GMT 1
I don't mind seeing dirty linen being aired in public Exactly. PMs are for boring conversations that provide the masses no entertainment at all, this on the other hand could be funny.
|
|
|
Post by ambergambler on May 10, 2011 16:56:50 GMT 1
I don't mind seeing dirty linen being aired in public Exactly. PMs are for boring conversations that provide the masses no entertainment at all, this on the other hand could be funny. Its not funny for Geoff Poor Little c***!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2011 17:43:07 GMT 1
it's boring if only Paul & Ned get involved in spats though. But out Ned, and c'mon Geoff. Ding! Ding! Round One
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on May 10, 2011 17:43:41 GMT 1
i'll let them throw abuse for a bit then move it
|
|
|
Post by Ned on May 10, 2011 17:50:33 GMT 1
it's boring if only Paul & Ned get involved in spats though. But out Ned, and c'mon Geoff. Ding! Ding! Round One Just making a point. Next time have some manners, you might get somewhere then.
|
|
|
Post by scottsalop on May 10, 2011 17:51:48 GMT 1
i'll let them throw abuse for a bit then move it
|
|
|
Post by maladroit on May 10, 2011 17:59:06 GMT 1
I'm with Feedo and Hippo. Throughout history, from Roman Gladiators, bear baiting and nude lesbian wrestling, this is what the public want. Will there be a prize for most cutting remark?
|
|
|
Post by Mike on May 10, 2011 18:04:16 GMT 1
Dr Crippen,
Just ask him for a fight at the next home game.
Either way he can't win. If he refuses you can say he bottled it and if he accepts then he will be a hypocrite because he will be fighting in the ground, something which he denounced on the other thread.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2011 18:41:15 GMT 1
it's boring if only Paul & Ned get involved in spats though. But out Ned, and c'mon Geoff. Ding! Ding! Round One Just making a point. Next time have some manners, you might get somewhere then. Ooooooooo. Sorreeeeeee. Touchy young git.
|
|
|
Post by SouthStandShrew on May 10, 2011 19:21:24 GMT 1
It's all good natured, let it be
|
|
|
Post by jamo on May 10, 2011 21:20:50 GMT 1
I say stop picking on kids.
|
|
|
Post by Amsterdammer on May 10, 2011 21:33:36 GMT 1
Expect some 3am barbed comments on here from the Doctor. The lad just needs a hug and his lead guitarist back..... Mozzer is almost smiling in that picture.
|
|
|
Post by albionshrew on May 10, 2011 23:15:06 GMT 1
As a "Geoff" I object to my name being aired in public.
|
|
|
Post by Fingers on May 11, 2011 0:04:14 GMT 1
Who cares.
People have to stand when others leave to go to the toilet - cause they stand up doesn't mean the atmosphere increases.
Let's not pander to one individual who is clearly somewhere below the level of a normal fan.
Besides this boards stance of banning people is like STFC's 'anyopne on the pitch means no one comes out' Crippen should have gone a long time ago - he adds nothing to the board other than vitriol - no chance of debate without abuse. As made clear in the other threads it's all about him - almost a self publicising feat.
Obviously stuck in the past and offers nothing for the future - this chap should take up a degree in History.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2011 0:33:23 GMT 1
I've clocked this thread and will respond accordingly when I've got a few minutes spare.
As for Fingers - you could only dream of the cult following I enjoy and the private messages of admiration that I occasionally receive.
Incidentally I am indeed nearing my final year of a History degree. Perhaps you are more insightful than I first realised.
|
|
|
Post by Fingers on May 11, 2011 0:38:59 GMT 1
I've clocked this thread and will respond accordingly when I've got a few minutes spare. As for Fingers - you could only dream of the cult following I enjoy and the private messages of admiration that I occasionally receive. Incidentally I am indeed nearing my final year of a History degree. Perhaps you are more insightful than I first realised. Knew you would only respond once i had called you out - obvioulsy you aspire to please me. Shame you didnt respond on the other thread to my debate. History - interesting degree. From what i remember on here you are at Liverpool. It pains me that the University has lowered itself to allowing people like you into the selected community. As a friendly piece of advice track down Dr Rogan Taylor - he will put you right on a load of footballing issues.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2011 0:57:34 GMT 1
Shame you didnt respond on the other thread to my debate. I genuinely find you very boring and would only dream of engaging with you as a last resort. However, please feel free to raise any issues on this thread and I will respond as a matter of urgency. I'm glad you approve of my course. It means a great deal.
|
|
|
Post by Fingers on May 11, 2011 1:05:15 GMT 1
Shame you didnt respond on the other thread to my debate. I genuinely find you very boring and would only dream of engaging with you as a last resort. However, please feel free to raise any issues on this thread and I will respond as a matter of urgency. I'm glad you approve of my course. It means a great deal. Didn't say I approved - again your attention to detail is lacking. Not raising anything here - I've raised it once already and if you choose to ignore that's your call. Another contradictory line - you really have a blurred sense of reality. Lastly really wish you wouldn't dream of me however if you do, make sure you record it for your quack. Qui ultimus egredietur lucernas exstinguito
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 11, 2011 6:31:27 GMT 1
I'll bet there's a belting anagram in that lot
|
|
|
Post by stuttgartershrew on May 11, 2011 10:13:00 GMT 1
I bet the first thing crippen does is point out that it should read "FAO" not "FOA". Maybe it stands for sommat else?
|
|
|
Post by venceremos on May 11, 2011 14:53:30 GMT 1
I've clocked this thread and will respond accordingly when I've got a few minutes spare. A nation waits .....
|
|