|
Post by abbey views on Apr 11, 2005 20:23:39 GMT 1
Dont forget the Histon debarcle also Anyway time will tell. he is the Messiah, Hail Hail Gary Peters, lets all worship in the gary peters temple that is the Blue and Amber, or Riverside chat. Hail hail GP
|
|
|
Post by telfordSHREWS on Apr 11, 2005 21:03:05 GMT 1
What Bally fails to grasp is the attitude of GP. Which is why I think alot of us are impressed with him. Post of the thread, GP came here and has done a job,he's honest and upfront , Macclesfield are up the top of the league and thats not by playing pretty f/ball, things would have been a different situation if we had GP from the start of the season. Last friday we played Cheltenham who were 2 wins better than us , yet it was described by the media and everyone else that they had nothing to play for they would be a relaxed side season over blah blah blah etc theres a stat for you.
|
|
|
Post by AFCBally on Apr 11, 2005 21:17:10 GMT 1
Who cares what Bally says? He supports a small, irrelevant club 6,000 leagues under us. He'll never realise what a hard job football league management is. He is obviously here to cause trouble- Ignore him, don't answer. Agree with him, smile, and he'll stop trying. We have a quality manager- Who is making a silk purse from a sours' ear, We know that- The players know that- The directors know that, and I think that even some of them know that. WE ARE FOOTBALL LEAGUE. Lol@ Geoff/LangmeadsMullet or what other guest name he is using on Buckschat at the minute. I am so sorry i didn't realise that only pro comments towards STFC and GP are welcome on here? As long as i praise Langmead and Wilkinson i will be safe i take it? No wonder quite a few dare not post as if what they say is not liked wo betide them.
|
|
|
Post by ThrobsBlackHat on Apr 11, 2005 23:24:51 GMT 1
Lol@ Geoff/LangmeadsMullet or what other guest name he is using on Buckschat at the minute. I am so sorry i didn't realise that only pro comments towards STFC and GP are welcome on here? As long as i praise Langmead and Wilkinson i will be safe i take it? No wonder quite a few dare not post as if what they say is not liked wo betide them. don't use the clique argument to cover your tracks, it does not wash If you act like a fool people will react. They would do it at work, in the pub, or on here. what point is it exactly you are trying to make?
|
|
|
Post by NickO on Apr 12, 2005 7:55:08 GMT 1
I can't take anything this bally fella says seriously. We could be top of the league playing like Brazil and he'd still come on here slagging something off in his guise of trying to make a valid point. Like TBH said, what is your point? It's already been said, he has taken a poor team with a lack of quality and turned it into an organised, hard to beat side, with a bit of quailty added in Lanmead and Aston. At the being of the season the more sensible people on here and around the Town would be happy with staying in the League. When this has been achieved then we can go from there.
|
|
|
Post by ThrobsBlackHat on Apr 12, 2005 8:26:16 GMT 1
exactly we were going down now we are staying up that is a revolution, and I certainly do not remember this many high scoring home victories so close together for a long time
|
|
|
Post by Chaz nli on Apr 12, 2005 8:26:53 GMT 1
I can't take anything this bally fella says seriously. We could be top of the league playing like Brazil and he'd still come on here slagging something off in his guise of trying to make a valid point. Like TBH said, what is your point? It's already been said, he has taken a poor team with a lack of quality and turned it into an organised, hard to beat side, with a bit of quailty added in Lanmead and Aston. At the being of the season the more sensible people on here and around the Town would be happy with staying in the League. When this has been achieved then we can go from there. Great post Nick- Bally's approach to winding us up is indeed very subtle- start an innocent looking thread which has a hidden agenda and get all those B&A boys to bite. I personally find it very hard to enjoy watching any other team besides Shrewsbury Town and yet Bally is often seen down the Meadow "supporting" the rivals he obviously hates- very strange
|
|
|
Post by PorkyShrew on Apr 12, 2005 8:36:10 GMT 1
don't use the clique argument to cover your tracks, it does not wash If you act like a fool people will react. They would do it at work, in the pub, or on here. what point is it exactly you are trying to make? ah very true... a few fights will be created by this individual round town maybe... and then waste ****ing hospital time
|
|
|
Post by Zatapec on Apr 12, 2005 8:55:24 GMT 1
Perhaps if people weren't quite so gullible and quick to the rise then this particular correspondant would enjoy a lesser profile.
Today in the office it was someones birthday so we all ate cake !
|
|
|
Post by Mr T on Apr 12, 2005 9:05:17 GMT 1
he's managed to make a good diffence to the performances and our postion when having limitations with budget too, he's probably not been able to bring in any where near the amount of players he wants cos this too many already on the wage bill.
And just look at the supporters now, under Quinn most people will disillusioned and depreseed, now a large amount of people are optomistic and upbeat!
|
|
|
Post by Fact Finder on Apr 12, 2005 10:18:03 GMT 1
Rush a championship winning squad and made it look very ordinary Peters a dejected bottom of the table squad and made it look ordinary Only one of those is an achievement That statement is incorrect. Rush over a bottom of the table squad. He did not take over a Championship winning squad. Likewise Peters also over a bottom of the table squad when he was appointed. If you want to be pedantic we could also use the statement that Rush over a team who had won the Conference the previous season and that Peters had taken over a team who had won the Conference Play Offs the previous season.
|
|
Bear in the Big Blue House Ch
Guest
|
Post by Bear in the Big Blue House Ch on Apr 12, 2005 10:23:03 GMT 1
Why compare us to what is going on at Chester City, a crazy football club with tiny crowds, a nutty chairman and a side that lays down and dies in local derbies. Quite simply, Gary P has made an incredible impact on our home playing performances. Over the last 10 games, we've amassed 20 points including a 5-0, a 4-2, a 4-1, a 4-0 and a 3-0. Also a 2-0 over Bristol rovers which was probably our most complete performance. Which is pretty remarkable given what we've had to put up with prior to that. Away, he's had little impact but if he can rectify that, and bring in some more decent players, then I'm sure he can turn us into a mid-table side for next year. That Football League, fancy making you play away games otherwise your masterplan was nearly complete. Please don't compare yourselves to us, we have ambition.
|
|
|
Post by Amy on Apr 12, 2005 10:26:41 GMT 1
Trust me if you'd seen the squad before GP came in, you'd be singing his praises.
Rodgers completely out of form, only Darby and Grant as back up.
Challis completely out of form at left back, Walton axed from the squad Sedgemore doing Lord can only know what in midfield.
The team couldn't defend and they couldn't score, so bearing in mind the last season we wre in this league and the results that occured when it transpired we couldn't defend, throw not being able to score into the mix and we suddenly look like relegation faviourates.
As a result one can only applaud him for the job he has done.
Yes there is plenty wrong, not least leaving Aiston on the bench for large chunks of ineffective away games. But he is still doing a good job over all.
|
|
|
Post by ThrobsBlackHat on Apr 12, 2005 10:28:40 GMT 1
Please don't compare yourselves to us, we have ambition. "ambition" can be substituted for "an insolvent financial position" and as for Rush, after how many games of the season did he join you?
|
|
|
Post by Plywood on Apr 12, 2005 10:36:40 GMT 1
I'm confused. Aren't Chester one of the most unsuccessful teams in the history of the Football League? I'd be interested to see what their average finish is out of the 92 clubs while they've been playing in the League. I'd be interested to see what their average attendance is while they've been playing in the League. I'd be interested to see what their roll of honour includes while they've been playing in the League. I'd be interested to see what their highest finish is out of the 92 clubs while they've been playing in the League. Basically, I'd be interested to see what contribution they've made to the league in all their years. But obviously that is irrelevant now they have Sir Vaughan at the helm. If they believe he can turn around god knows how many years of failure with his mockery of a masterplan then let them believe. Like we told KFC - it'll all end in tears
|
|
|
Post by ThrobsBlackHat on Apr 12, 2005 10:43:37 GMT 1
Like we told KFC - it'll all end in tears Darn right - if a business is losing money all the time then something somewhere will go wrong Telford, Hornchurch, it always happens, there is only so long you can bankroll a club before either you run out of money or you run out of passion Chester are unsustainable witht heir current crowds and current wages. Something has to change. Investing for promotion is not the answer, just ask Rushden
|
|
|
Post by Fact Finder on Apr 12, 2005 11:15:42 GMT 1
Darn right - if a business is losing money all the time then something somewhere will go wrong Telford, Hornchurch, it always happens, there is only so long you can bankroll a club before either you run out of money or you run out of passion Chester are unsustainable witht heir current crowds and current wages. Something has to change. Investing for promotion is not the answer, just ask Rushden Correct me if I am wrong but I thought Telford went tits up because of another business owned by the Chairman going bump and dragging them down with it. Then surely your statement could apply to most league clubs that have sugar daddy owners including Chelsea. Of course it is not ideal but it does not mean that the end is nigh should you have one major shareholder.
|
|
|
Post by timgallon on Apr 12, 2005 11:21:08 GMT 1
I'm confused. Aren't Chester one of the most unsuccessful teams in the history of the Football League? I'd be interested to see what their average finish is out of the 92 clubs while they've been playing in the League. I'd be interested to see what their average attendance is while they've been playing in the League. I'd be interested to see what their roll of honour includes while they've been playing in the League. I'd be interested to see what their highest finish is out of the 92 clubs while they've been playing in the League. Basically, I'd be interested to see what contribution they've made to the league in all their years. But obviously that is irrelevant now they have Sir Vaughan at the helm. If they believe he can turn around god knows how many years of failure with his mockery of a masterplan then let them believe. Like we told KFC - it'll all end in tears Spot on Plywood, Im increasingly taking umbrage by the Chester fans attitude regarding ambition and being a big club. Who the hell do they think they are. They have taken in the words of thier messiah Vaughan and cant see the wood for the trees. Some time in the future it will all end in tears and they wont get an ounce of symathy off me.
|
|
|
Post by Fact Finder on Apr 12, 2005 11:22:55 GMT 1
I'm confused. Aren't Chester one of the most unsuccessful teams in the history of the Football League? I'd be interested to see what their average finish is out of the 92 clubs while they've been playing in the League. I'd be interested to see what their average attendance is while they've been playing in the League. I'd be interested to see what their roll of honour includes while they've been playing in the League. I'd be interested to see what their highest finish is out of the 92 clubs while they've been playing in the League. Basically, I'd be interested to see what contribution they've made to the league in all their years. But obviously that is irrelevant now they have Sir Vaughan at the helm. If they believe he can turn around god knows how many years of failure with his mockery of a masterplan then let them believe. Like we told KFC - it'll all end in tears For these facts and more visit. www.chester-cityfc.co.uk
|
|
|
Post by Carter on Apr 12, 2005 11:24:36 GMT 1
Im increasingly taking umbrage.
|
|
|
Post by ThrobsBlackHat on Apr 12, 2005 11:48:09 GMT 1
Correct me if I am wrong but I thought Telford went tits up because of another business owned by the Chairman going bump and dragging them down with it. Then surely your statement could apply to most league clubs that have sugar daddy owners including Chelsea. Of course it is not ideal but it does not mean that the end is nigh should you have one major shareholder. Yes it does If Vaughan's business interests take a turnf or the worst then chester are in trouble If Vaughan leaves Chester are in trouble And yes, Chelsea could all come crashing down Spending money that comes from outside the "core" income a football club is not sustainable. That is why Blackburn won the title once and Wolves only managed a season int he premiership. A sugar daddy will only get you so far. A decent youth system, and good manager and prudent finances will keep you ate a given level in the long term That is why I want Gary Peters at Shrewsbury with a decent training centre at the New meadow
|
|
|
Post by AFCBally on Apr 12, 2005 11:55:25 GMT 1
ah very true... a few fights will be created by this individual round town maybe... and then waste ****ing hospital time i must award this post from Porky Shrew the most outrageous totally over the top post i have seen for quite some time Wow what a total overreaction on this thread you are all looking for something in my posts that simply isn't there. i have had to read my posts again to see if some of the abuse is justified? and to be honest i don't think it is. As for you TBH i personally know some Shrews fans who won't post on this board due to the reaction they may get, whether you believe that or not it is a fact?
|
|
|
Post by alfonso on Apr 12, 2005 11:56:38 GMT 1
Same old sloppies. Ideas way above themselves
|
|
|
Post by petetheloon on Apr 12, 2005 11:59:38 GMT 1
god almighty, sombody please give him his dummy back so he can be quiet
|
|
|
Post by Chaz nli on Apr 12, 2005 12:00:37 GMT 1
Bally
1) I havent given you any abuse 2) You still havent told us why you started this thread 3) Why do you come and watch our games? 4) Have you got anthing positive to say about STFC?
|
|
|
Post by Ratcliffesghost on Apr 12, 2005 12:01:40 GMT 1
you are all looking for something in my posts that simply isn't there. Common sense
|
|
|
Post by AFCBally on Apr 12, 2005 12:07:09 GMT 1
Bally 1) I havent given you any abuse 2) You still havent told us why you started this thread 3) Why do you come and watch our games? 4) Have you got anthing positive to say about STFC? 1 true you haven't but others have 2 like i said i was curious to Peters record since he has taken over, as in the Shropshire Star it stated while he has been at Shrews his manegerial pedigree had risen? 3 Coz i like watching live football, i have also been to Wolves,Bridgenorth and Shifnal this year. 4. I have stated in the past that Langmead and Wilkinson are both good signings and apart from Sheron he seems to be signing younger players which if i were a STFC fan i would be pleased with. i can also see that you are harder to beat since GP over. Hows that?
|
|
|
Post by jamo on Apr 12, 2005 12:10:43 GMT 1
you are all looking for something in my posts that simply isn't there. That'll be right. Reasoned, logical argument with perhaps a hint of humour would be a start. Oh, i forgot . Lol
|
|
|
Post by Chaz nli on Apr 12, 2005 12:10:44 GMT 1
1 true you haven't but others have 2 like i said i was curious to Peters record since he has taken over, as in the Shropshire Star it stated while he has been at Shrews his manegerial pedigree had risen? 3 Coz i like watching live football, i have also been to Wolves,Bridgenorth and Shifnal this year. 4. I have stated in the past that Langmead and Wilkinson are both good signings and apart from Sheron he seems to be signing younger players which if i were a STFC fan i would be pleased with. i can also see that you are harder to beat since GP over. Hows that? Hey- not bad so you are not banned
|
|
|
Post by petetheloon on Apr 12, 2005 12:10:56 GMT 1
not good enough!!! I order the clique commander to have him banned for speaking out of line
|
|