|
Post by northwestman on Apr 28, 2019 21:11:50 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by Valerioch on Apr 28, 2019 21:18:10 GMT 1
You’re taught to play to the whistle.
Villa in the wrong for me. Fair play Bielsa
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 28, 2019 22:21:59 GMT 1
Play to the whistle. They’re professional players, to completely stop when the ball is still in play is just incompetence.
As far as I’m aware the ref will only stop the game himself if it’s a head injury, the players don’t have to put the ball out as soon as someone goes down.
Last week at home to Oxford one of their lads went down ‘injured’ we didn’t put the ball out as we were attacking, when they won the ball back he immediately jumped up and tried to make a run in behind. This is exactly why you should play to the whistle and not put the ball out, all he was trying to do was stop our attack, stop our advantage by feigning injury. I’m not saying the Villa lad wasn’t injured but everyone on that pitch knows you play to the whistle.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 28, 2019 22:33:01 GMT 1
Apparently, Villa had previously kicked the ball out when a Leeds player had gone down, to give it some sense of perspective.
|
|
|
Post by venceremos on Apr 28, 2019 23:25:50 GMT 1
Yes, you play to the whistle but Leeds players had stopped as well as Villa’s, then a couple decided to carry on. Bielsa did the right thing.
Bamford should be retrospectively banned and the Villa player’s red card rescinded - horrible bit of cheating that was.
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Apr 28, 2019 23:45:05 GMT 1
of course Leeds play to the whistle themselves
|
|
|
Post by ThrobsBlackHat on Apr 29, 2019 0:08:27 GMT 1
Bamford should be retrospectively banned and the Villa player’s red card rescinded - horrible bit of cheating that was.
Agreed, Bamford was absolutely shocking!
I understand you play to the whistle, but Tyler Roberts clearly points out to where he is going to or wants them to kick the ball and then passes it forwards instead.
It might be technically not against any law in the game but is against any shred of decency.
It is not about playing on when a player has gone down, it is about pretending you are going to knock it out to gain an advantage then using that advantage to score.
It was disgusting. You can't defend that.
|
|
|
Post by wakemanender on Apr 29, 2019 10:51:28 GMT 1
You have to play to the whistle especially when playing Sc***horpe. Imagine the extra time if the ball was put out of play each time one of their players goes down. Hopefully they will be taking their show on the road to League 2 next season.
|
|
|
Post by tvor on Apr 30, 2019 20:19:02 GMT 1
Good to see that the red card has been rescinded and that Bamford is now facing a two match ban for 'deception'.
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Apr 30, 2019 20:58:43 GMT 1
surely the ref could have disallowed this goal under the "showing disrespect to the game" or "unsporting behaviour" rules
common sense refs, come on
|
|
sibshrew
Shropshire County League
Posts: 10
|
Post by sibshrew on Apr 30, 2019 22:39:35 GMT 1
I don't think the lad on the wing for Leeds was trying to trick Villa, it looked like he was in two minds about whether to put it out and had a moment of indecision.
I can't believe that conceding a goal on purpose is allowed. Surely sportsmanship does not extend to directly fixing the result of the match. What about the people who bet on <1.5 goals?
The amount of gamesmanship and outright cheating that goes on in football, I wish they would just ditch the kick the ball out custom. There is no point pretending that football is for good sports. Leave it up to the ref then everyone knows where they stand.
I'd make diving legal to. It is silly that if a player receives a tiny brush on the laces, he is entitled to go down even if the contact was never enough to cause him to fall over but if the contact he is anticipating doesn't come, he is a cheat. In both cases, the intention is to deceive the ref so they might as well make everything fair game. I think the idea that diving is unacceptable will go with VAR because it will be picked up inside the box and is already acceptable outside the box as "buying a foul".
Bamford fooled the ref but so did the guy who got Maitland-Niles sent off the other day. Why is one acceptable but not the other?
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Apr 30, 2019 23:48:20 GMT 1
. What about the people who bet on <1.5 goals? you mean Pontus Jansson ? he had a few quid on it I think ;-)
|
|
|
Post by accordingtome on May 1, 2019 6:54:41 GMT 1
I don't think the lad on the wing for Leeds was trying to trick Villa, it looked like he was in two minds about whether to put it out and had a moment of indecision. I can't believe that conceding a goal on purpose is allowed. Surely sportsmanship does not extend to directly fixing the result of the match. What about the people who bet on <1.5 goals? The amount of gamesmanship and outright cheating that goes on in football, I wish they would just ditch the kick the ball out custom. There is no point pretending that football is for good sports. Leave it up to the ref then everyone knows where they stand. I'd make diving legal to. It is silly that if a player receives a tiny brush on the laces, he is entitled to go down even if the contact was never enough to cause him to fall over but if the contact he is anticipating doesn't come, he is a cheat. In both cases, the intention is to deceive the ref so they might as well make everything fair game. I think the idea that diving is unacceptable will go with VAR because it will be picked up inside the box and is already acceptable outside the box as "buying a foul". Bamford fooled the ref but so did the guy who got Maitland-Niles sent off the other day. Why is one acceptable but not the other? football is a game where 22 cheats are Trying to deceive the cheat in black with the whistle
|
|