Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 8, 2014 11:33:58 GMT 1
I make no apologies for this, although it may be uncomfortable reading for some. Why are we so involved with this ex - player? You could say, well from the title and content of this thread you are part of the problem! My view is that we seem to take every opportunity to have a go at this young lad for no other reason other than he is an ex- player and decided to leave us. But he did,nt actually leave us of his own accord, more like he was pushed out. Fair enough, players come and go, managers change and have their own opinions on team building. Tom Bradshaw was considered by many to be not up to the standard required. Maybe, but the previous manager , in my view held him out to dry. Playing a young striker, alone, up front, against two big central defenders and feeding him high balls was never going to work. He was crying out to be played as the foil to a bigger partner, but that never happened. Anyone who witnessed his goal(s) against Crewe and Bradford, both away, could see that the boy had some modicum of ability.
He he may or may not score against us today, but he is still receiving abuse from our fans every bit as repulsive as when he played for us. Why? His perceived failure when playing for us was brought about by the manager at that time, in my view. Remember the cup game v. Walsall at their place, when apart from playing midfielders as full backs and other players out of position, we played Bradshaw as a loan striker and he failed, miserably.
lets give it a rest and accepted that we have all moved on, him and us. This Cup game seems to be more of a BRadshaw v. Town than anything else, which is a great shame.
|
|
|
Post by markglasgow on Nov 8, 2014 11:44:10 GMT 1
Not sure we needed another TB thread but agree we should more on. Game day.
|
|
|
Post by ssshrew on Nov 8, 2014 12:06:24 GMT 1
As I've said before blown up by the Press.
|
|
myttonmarauder
Midland League Division One
For all your bearing requirements come to www.wmtbearings.co.uk and use our online shop
Posts: 286
|
Post by myttonmarauder on Nov 8, 2014 12:19:10 GMT 1
I make no apologies for this, although it may be uncomfortable reading for some. Why are we so involved with this ex - player? You could say, well from the title and content of this thread you are part of the problem! My view is that we seem to take every opportunity to have a go at this young lad for no other reason other than he is an ex- player and decided to leave us. But he did,nt actually leave us of his own accord, more like he was pushed out. Fair enough, players come and go, managers change and have their own opinions on team building. Tom Bradshaw was considered by many to be not up to the standard required. Maybe, but the previous manager , in my view held him out to dry. Playing a young striker, alone, up front, against two big central defenders and feeding him high balls was never going to work. He was crying out to be played as the foil to a bigger partner, but that never happened. Anyone who witnessed his goal(s) against Crewe and Bradford, both away, could see that the boy had some modicum of ability. He he may or may not score against us today, but he is still receiving abuse from our fans every bit as repulsive as when he played for us. Why? His perceived failure when playing for us was brought about by the manager at that time, in my view. Remember the cup game v. Walsall at their place, when apart from playing midfielders as full backs and other players out of position, we played Bradshaw as a loan striker and he failed, miserably. lets give it a rest and accepted that we have all moved on, him and us. This Cup game seems to be more of a BRadshaw v. Town than anything else, which is a great shame.
|
|
myttonmarauder
Midland League Division One
For all your bearing requirements come to www.wmtbearings.co.uk and use our online shop
Posts: 286
|
Post by myttonmarauder on Nov 8, 2014 12:19:58 GMT 1
Absolutely nailed on, very well said
|
|
|
Post by shrewder on Nov 8, 2014 12:41:37 GMT 1
Let's hope after today this subject can come to an end and we can move on and get back to just having a passing interest in just another ex player.
|
|
|
Post by stuttgartershrew on Nov 8, 2014 13:23:17 GMT 1
Dunno worry. It'll be all too much for him. Expect he won't get on the score sheet and will be subbed with about half an hour to go... Fingers crossed anyhows...
|
|
|
Post by Slackbladder on Nov 8, 2014 13:47:21 GMT 1
This was the main topic that the local media could hold onto in the build up to the game. Now it has been blown up out of all proportion and become a vehicle for the haters to vent their spleens. Wouldn't surprise me if TB scores today, which will probably generate even more bile.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 8, 2014 13:57:30 GMT 1
From the title and content of this thread you are part of the problem!
|
|
|
Post by warsawpact on Nov 8, 2014 14:56:05 GMT 1
Tbf, I don't think you've been unfair to TB, and I don't think he's been unfair to you.
The press were always going to go to Bradshaw for some quotations - don't think he's said anything untoward.
I'll take Bradshaw not scoring - as long as Romaine Sawyers scores a hat-trick!
In other news, Wulfs losing 5-0. This is obviously BAD for West Midlands football (© Radio WM) (titter)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2014 1:49:46 GMT 1
Great hypocritical thread by an attention seeking thread starter. Why start a new thread when there are already 100's here already on the same subject? What was wrong in using one of them? Worried you wouldn't get the same attention if you posted in them? You are adding to the problem by going on about it. Tom Bradshaw threads are more numerous than Shrewsbury Town threads.
Are you all that small minded that you cannot think of more than a few other things regarding the Club. Big deal a player who played for Shrewsbury now plays for someone else WOW!!.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2014 11:01:56 GMT 1
Great hypocritical thread by an attention seeking thread starter. Why start a new thread when there are already 100's here already on the same subject? What was wrong in using one of them? Worried you wouldn't get the same attention if you posted in them? You are adding to the problem by going on about it. Tom Bradshaw threads are more numerous than Shrewsbury Town threads. Are you all that small minded that you cannot think of more than a few other things regarding the Club. Big deal a player who played for Shrewsbury now plays for someone else WOW!!. I think you have missed the point.The thread was started as a counter-point to a few previous threads, albeit the focus being on the same player. Even I acknowledged it was "another " thread concerning TB, did you not realise the significance of the "again", added to the title. Try and be a bit more accurate if you need to quote facts to back up your argument, 100's of posts on TB, sorry I must have missed the other 90 odd. Mind you I believe you know a number of fans who started watching the Town in 1923, can,t say I have met many, if any, fans who support the club and have also received a signed telegram and a bunch of Cape Grapes from Her Majesty. Maybe they are in another stand singing Their old hearts out. If you think I am adding to the problem, what are you doing adding your tuppence worth to this thread. Attention seeking....really. Funny how this is my latest thread, since APRIL 2014, whereas you have spawned at least four,all instantly forgettable. And, to top it all, one of your latest thread title was, and this cracked me up, " Guess who the next ex-player thread will be about"!! If you don,t think you will like the answer, don,t ask the question. Looking forward to to your next thread or posts. Jog on.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2014 11:21:27 GMT 1
Am I too late to plant some outdoor tomatoes..............sorry wrong thread?
|
|
|
Post by GrizzlyShrew on Nov 10, 2014 11:23:39 GMT 1
Dunno worry. It'll be all too much for him. Expect he won't get on the score sheet and will be subbed with about half an hour to go... Fingers crossed anyhows... OUCH......................
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2014 11:33:37 GMT 1
Great hypocritical thread by an attention seeking thread starter. Why start a new thread when there are already 100's here already on the same subject? What was wrong in using one of them? Worried you wouldn't get the same attention if you posted in them? You are adding to the problem by going on about it. Tom Bradshaw threads are more numerous than Shrewsbury Town threads. Are you all that small minded that you cannot think of more than a few other things regarding the Club. Big deal a player who played for Shrewsbury now plays for someone else WOW!!. I think you have missed the point.The thread was started as a counter-point to a few previous threads, albeit the focus being on the same player. Even I acknowledged it was "another " thread concerning TB, did you not realise the significance of the "again", added to the title. Try and be a bit more accurate if you need to quote facts to back up your argument, 100's of posts on TB, sorry I must have missed the other 90 odd. Mind you I believe you know a number of fans who started watching the Town in 1923, can,t say I have met many, if any, fans who support the club and have also received a signed telegram and a bunch of Cape Grapes from Her Majesty. Maybe they are in another stand singing Their old hearts out. If you think I am adding to the problem, what are you doing adding your tuppence worth to this thread. Attention seeking....really. Funny how this is my latest thread, since APRIL 2014, whereas you have spawned at least four,all instantly forgettable. And, to top it all, one of your latest thread title was, and this cracked me up, " Guess who the next ex-player thread will be about"!! If you don,t think you will like the answer, don,t ask the question. Looking forward to to your next thread or posts. Jog on. You started a Tom Bradshaw thread you added ''another'' why couldn't you use the 100's of other threads did you really need to start a thread due to adding one word? (See Threads not Posts) You did it to draw attention to yourself like the rest of the thread starters here who cannot search a couple of pages for an identical topic. For you it didn't even require looking beyond the first page. So answer your own question why are you so involved in an ex player? You go on a long rant about everyone else without understanding you are no better than they are. Oh and to my ex player thread it was a p**s take too posters such as yourself who need to start a thread on an ex player because they may have had Weetabix instead of Cornflakes this morning.
|
|
|
Post by bobbytheblock19er on Nov 10, 2014 11:40:23 GMT 1
Axlerose laying into somebody again ? No way!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2014 12:11:47 GMT 1
I ask again, where are these 100,s of other threads. Nice for us to know that the thread starters are attention seekers. Or maybe they want to approach the subject from a different angle? What's the problem. The problem would be if nobody started threads. Still, I am sure we will all consult you before we open a thread to see if it is allowed. You have been called an arrogant prick before, I wonder why? I would not describe my thread as a "rant" just me expressing an opinion. I think you have cornered the market in " rants" if your last two posts are anything to go by, you even seem to have stayed up late to compose your first post on this subject.
Oh, my breakfast of choice is coffee and a nice ciggie. Hope you enjoyed your Farleys Rusks this morning, with nice warm milk. Yum yum.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2014 12:45:54 GMT 1
I ask again, where are these 100,s of other threads. Nice for us to know that the thread starters are attention seekers. Or maybe they want to approach the subject from a different angle? What's the problem. The problem would be if nobody started threads. Still, I am sure we will all consult you before we open a thread to see if it is allowed. You have been called an arrogant prick before, I wonder why? I would not describe my thread as a "rant" just me expressing an opinion. I think you have cornered the market in " rants" if your last two posts are anything to go by, you even seem to have stayed up late to compose your first post on this subject. Oh, my breakfast of choice is coffee and a nice ciggie. Hope you enjoyed your Farleys Rusks this morning, with nice warm milk. Yum yum. Can you use the search tools, tool? Type in Tom Bradshaw and it will bring up all the Tom Bradshaw threads there are three on page one including yours. And why did you think the need to post a brand new one wasn't the other ones sufficient?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2014 13:45:18 GMT 1
I think I have already answered this once. All the TB threads, all 3, including mine. That's three, not your so-called hundreds, and, as I said, I decided to open a new thread to cover a stance not covered by the other two. Do you expect me to ask for permission to open a new thread from you, moron. It seems, if you look, that , in your terms, 100's of posters liked the opening post and agreed with it. Maybe they will get criticised by you as well, guilty by association. But anyway, thank you Numb- nuts, for joining a thread that you so stringently oppose.
Maybe you should have a good word with yourself for letting yourself down . Now jog on. .
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2014 15:42:49 GMT 1
Oh dear , oh dear, Bunkem getting boshed once again for starting an inappropriate thread. " let's give it a rest and accept that we have all moved on, him and us ". He certainly has , he now plays for Walsall , but you certainly haven't , you keep on and on about him . I'm about to start a new thread entitled " Bunkem goes on about Tom Bradshaw -again " . Please feel free to contribute ,should be right up your street.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2014 15:49:04 GMT 1
3 on page 1 of B & A including yours, Walsall match threads that have become Tom Bradshaw threads on page one. There are at least 30 on B & A titled Tom Bradshaw that is before all the topics that become Tom Bradshaw ones. You started the topic moaning about people going on about him how dumb is that. You started a new one to get attention as you wanted to prove how clever you were by adding ''another''. You could of used any one of those TB threads but no I'll start a ''brand new one''on a different topic. Whats different about yours to all the others? Nothing.. The forum has become a joke and looks as though fans cannot think of anything else. You complaining about Tom Bradshaw threads by starting one. You are not clever enough to be that ironic. And I'm going to wind you up about it as your to dumb to notice.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2014 16:02:26 GMT 1
If you could compose a decent post then I may take you seriously, but obviously you are as thick." There are at least 30 on B&A titled Tom Bradshaw that is before all the topics that become TB ones" Einstein, I bow to your use of the mother tongue, how you manage it baffles me but you have a skill for posting s****. Now you go on to complain about the forum becoming a joke. Is it because we have,nt asked you if its o.k to start anew thread.
560 posts of dirge, and he wants to run the show.
As I,ve said before, when God gave out heads, you thought he said beds, and asked for a big soft one.
Jog on.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2014 16:03:05 GMT 1
3 on page 1 of B & A including yours, Walsall match threads that have become Tom Bradshaw threads on page one. There are at least 30 on B & A titled Tom Bradshaw that is before all the topics that become Tom Bradshaw ones. You started the topic moaning about people going on about him how dumb is that. You started a new one to get attention as you wanted to prove how clever you were by adding ''another''. You could of used any one of those TB threads but no I'll start a ''brand new one''on a different topic. Whats different about yours to all the others? Nothing.. The forum has become a joke and looks as though fans cannot think of anything else. You complaining about Tom Bradshaw threads by starting one you dumb s**t. You are not clever enough to be that ironic. And I'm going to wind you up about it as your to dumb to notice. You're wasting your time , you really are . Believe me after about another 6 cups of coffee and 20 fags he' ll be off again , ranting and raving like he usually does on some daft topic of interest only to his good self . If I were you I would stop now , You'll only end up as demented as he is . Oh , and don't use the word ironic , Bunkem doesn't do irony , well , he does but not intentionally which , in this context is probably ironic in itself .
|
|
|
Post by Matster on Nov 10, 2014 16:50:28 GMT 1
On the subject of too many threads, could we just have one thread for the season for other team's managers who get the sack and the new ones who get employed.
|
|
|
Post by kuffdam72 on Nov 10, 2014 17:07:17 GMT 1
3 on page 1 of B & A including yours, Walsall match threads that have become Tom Bradshaw threads on page one. There are at least 30 on B & A titled Tom Bradshaw that is before all the topics that become Tom Bradshaw ones. You started the topic moaning about people going on about him how dumb is that. You started a new one to get attention as you wanted to prove how clever you were by adding ''another''. You could of used any one of those TB threads but no I'll start a ''brand new one''on a different topic. Whats different about yours to all the others? Nothing.. The forum has become a joke and looks as though fans cannot think of anything else. You complaining about Tom Bradshaw threads by starting one you dumb s**t. You are not clever enough to be that ironic. And I'm going to wind you up about it as your to dumb to notice. One question for you, do you get out of the house much?
|
|
|
Post by Slackbladder on Nov 10, 2014 17:21:28 GMT 1
3 on page 1 of B & A including yours, Walsall match threads that have become Tom Bradshaw threads on page one. There are at least 30 on B & A titled Tom Bradshaw that is before all the topics that become Tom Bradshaw ones. You started the topic moaning about people going on about him how dumb is that. You started a new one to get attention as you wanted to prove how clever you were by adding ''another''. You could of used any one of those TB threads but no I'll start a ''brand new one''on a different topic. Whats different about yours to all the others? Nothing.. The forum has become a joke and looks as though fans cannot think of anything else. You complaining about Tom Bradshaw threads by starting one you dumb s**t. You are not clever enough to be that ironic. And I'm going to wind you up about it as your to dumb to notice. I can see the irony. Do I get a prize? Look, you have used "You are" correctly in one sentence and then got it wrong in the the very next sentence. That's not dumb, that's clever. As is using "of" when it should be "have." I agree this forum is becoming a joke and you, sir, are the master of irony.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2014 17:33:49 GMT 1
you are as thick as s****." a skill for posting s****. . Can I just check. Are the "starred" out words supposed to say s***? I only ask as there appears to be one too many * in each s***!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2014 17:50:09 GMT 1
I have posted s**te as opposed to s**t, s**te being a somewhat softer word to use IMO. Where the censors put their * is up to them. Hope this helps.
|
|
|
Post by El Presidente on Nov 10, 2014 18:04:44 GMT 1
I have posted s**** as opposed to s**t, s**** being a somewhat softer word to use IMO. Where the censors put their * is up to them. Hope this helps.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2014 18:05:15 GMT 1
I have posted s**** as opposed to s**t, s**** being a somewhat softer word to use IMO. Where the censors put their * is up to them. Hope this helps. Now I am worried Bunkem. You have completely lost the plot owd lad . You haven't been sharing Kuffdam's roll-ups again have you? You know what happened last time you and Kuffdam went two's up , Mrs Bradshaw was most put out -Again .
|
|