Post by El Huracán!!!! on Sept 2, 2010 10:01:52 GMT 1
Nicko, its been more than twice that B and A has been the cause of discussion at the clubs fans reps meetings (all realted to rumors which have all started from a leak at the fooball club). I dont know whats happened to them, some postive stuff used to come out of them, after we had taken all the "bad" news that would be annouced first...(not last time, the last one with Dave Hughes and Martin annouced was good, but then once again it side tracked on B and A bashing, as I attempted with Jamo to explain that its just rumors that have come from the football club!)
They could still be happening but I could be been univited ..... they will probs be back the next time there is a bitter pill to swallow from the club.... not like they were ever regualr things just for feedback purposes???
As a mod of B and A I cant make my mind up about it, wheres the limit on a rumor that might need removing, or is there a limit? Incert the "Alledgely" word and surely anything is fair game??? I dont know enough about it to be honest, but I dont think myself and Pilch want B and A threatend such as is happened in the Northampton case, however I would passinatly argue that B and A is a talking shop designed for town fans to discuss anything about the club?
A great example is the rumor/fact that we did not pay anything for Ainsworth, no fee was inolved and we just agreed a sell on %, a hefty one at that. Now I dont think I have seen this on B and A, but it's the news doing the rounds...
The football club MAY object to the rumor above but is that fair? Buy not providing clarity on the fee or not its open to discussion... we have had it with Holt, Constable, Hart.. and on and on... surely that has to be accepted by the club. I think thats fair enough...
Now I could just make a rumor up... (for the record this is 100% false)
"It was seen that Ian Whitfield recently ran over the chairmans dog and was seen to laugh" ****
Totally made up, but could anyone say that NEVER happened? Should something along these lines be removed...
To be fair there are a lot of "rumors" that are doing the rounds in the pubs and pre match about certain people at the fooball club that have NEVER been posted on B and A, some of them pretty shocking and worth discussion... related to things that have occered before people joined the club, but I like to think that people on here know where the limit it... and there are certinly very few situatuions where the club have ever contact B and A to interveen...
Hope it keeps that way to be honest...
Taking it out further look at the ruckus the zine called two issues ago caused, all over some factualy and rumored events at the football club, and the rumors had originally leaked out of the club....
*** Note Ian Whitfield has never and would never laugh at a dog getting run over... he is incapable of laughter
They could still be happening but I could be been univited ..... they will probs be back the next time there is a bitter pill to swallow from the club.... not like they were ever regualr things just for feedback purposes???
As a mod of B and A I cant make my mind up about it, wheres the limit on a rumor that might need removing, or is there a limit? Incert the "Alledgely" word and surely anything is fair game??? I dont know enough about it to be honest, but I dont think myself and Pilch want B and A threatend such as is happened in the Northampton case, however I would passinatly argue that B and A is a talking shop designed for town fans to discuss anything about the club?
A great example is the rumor/fact that we did not pay anything for Ainsworth, no fee was inolved and we just agreed a sell on %, a hefty one at that. Now I dont think I have seen this on B and A, but it's the news doing the rounds...
The football club MAY object to the rumor above but is that fair? Buy not providing clarity on the fee or not its open to discussion... we have had it with Holt, Constable, Hart.. and on and on... surely that has to be accepted by the club. I think thats fair enough...
Now I could just make a rumor up... (for the record this is 100% false)
"It was seen that Ian Whitfield recently ran over the chairmans dog and was seen to laugh" ****
Totally made up, but could anyone say that NEVER happened? Should something along these lines be removed...
To be fair there are a lot of "rumors" that are doing the rounds in the pubs and pre match about certain people at the fooball club that have NEVER been posted on B and A, some of them pretty shocking and worth discussion... related to things that have occered before people joined the club, but I like to think that people on here know where the limit it... and there are certinly very few situatuions where the club have ever contact B and A to interveen...
Hope it keeps that way to be honest...
Taking it out further look at the ruckus the zine called two issues ago caused, all over some factualy and rumored events at the football club, and the rumors had originally leaked out of the club....
*** Note Ian Whitfield has never and would never laugh at a dog getting run over... he is incapable of laughter