|
|
Post by ShrewsandRoyals on Dec 3, 2003 21:57:30 GMT 1
0-0 half time. Not quite sure how, but Chelski are going for it and leaving space on the break. Given they have had 73% of the ball and 14 shots I am happy that Reading soak it up as long as possible and go for the counter punch.....Nerves are shot listening to it!
|
|
|
|
Post by ShrewsandRoyals on Dec 3, 2003 22:22:38 GMT 1
Well, at least it took them 58 minutes! Now it gets tough....
|
|
|
|
Post by ShrewsandRoyals on Dec 3, 2003 23:00:37 GMT 1
Well done boys! Bet Shrewsbury would take a 1-0 defeat against that team! Great to hear such applause at the end too.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 3, 2003 23:02:20 GMT 1
Aye, good effort I'm sure... highlights on TV at 11:30pm on ITV - darn Sarf I'm sure Chelsea will be the featured game too.
|
|
|
|
Post by confused on Dec 3, 2003 23:21:51 GMT 1
please help! first we lose the rivals board now the temporary board is full of other teams match reports!!!
ps chelsea being bank rolled by a russian does not excuse racist comments like "chelski"
|
|
|
|
Post by RuytonShrew on Dec 3, 2003 23:27:00 GMT 1
Get a grip! Chelski is not racist, it's just a play on a word. The world has gone P.C. mad!
|
|
|
|
Post by confused on Dec 3, 2003 23:34:28 GMT 1
what word is it a play on then?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 3, 2003 23:37:36 GMT 1
Totally agreed Chris.
|
|
|
|
Post by RuytonShrew on Dec 3, 2003 23:38:44 GMT 1
Cheers Ant.
And 'confused' the word - that'll be Chelsea! Not particularly subtle I admit but not in the slightest way offensive! If you want to worry about racism then there are many real examples of it in football without worrying about a nickname like this which upsets no-one (except you).
If you want to do something useful to stamp out racist views then back the Kick Racism Out of Football campaign. Or, if you're a Shrews fan, get in touch with Throbs Black Hat off this board and help him with his work on the Fans Charter.
|
|
|
|
Post by ShrewsandRoyals on Dec 3, 2003 23:38:50 GMT 1
Confused is obviously an appropriate mask to hide under;D
|
|
|
|
Post by ProfessorPatPending on Dec 3, 2003 23:40:38 GMT 1
please help! first we lose the rivals board now the temporary board is full of other teams match reports!!! ps chelsea being bank rolled by a russian does not excuse racist comments like "chelski" Do you actually understand the meaning of racism? Which race do you believe is being prejudiced by this comment? |
|
|
|
Post by ShrewsandRoyals on Dec 3, 2003 23:53:00 GMT 1
For your information Confused (so you aren't any more  ).... racist adj 1: based on racial intolerance; "racist remarks" No - not intollerant of anyone based on their race or religion. Proudly married by a black priest too. 2: discriminatory especially on the basis of race or religion [syn: {antiblack}, {anti-Semitic}, {anti-Semite(a)}] - Can't see I discrimated there - do I need to define discriminate? n : a person with a prejudiced belief that one race is superior to others [syn: {racialist}] - The only belief I had tonight was that they were going to be superior than us and quite rightly so! They are not classed as a race unless I've missed something. As my money is good enough to support The Shrews, I am probably allowed to ask for support on a big match night...don't read it later as I'll probably have a match report posted by a Shrews fan I know that went! |
|
|
|
Post by Evo10 on Dec 4, 2003 0:00:21 GMT 1
I think confused has had you all off big style!!!! hahahahahahhahahahahaha ;D ;D ;D  |
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Dec 4, 2003 0:07:09 GMT 1
lol
all the tabloids must be racist as well
they add ski to every word chelsea related
i suggest confused goes and f***s offski ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by confused on Dec 4, 2003 0:53:29 GMT 1
evo10 you are a top chap/chapess love from confusedski.
|
|
