|
Post by Pilch on Jan 10, 2004 20:10:55 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by skipwithrob on Jan 10, 2004 20:14:21 GMT 1
Which surely they did?
|
|
|
Post by grinfish on Jan 10, 2004 20:15:13 GMT 1
(d) Playing Condition of the Ground
(i) Each Club must take every precaution to ensure that its ground is in a fit playing condition.
What precaution did they fail to take Pilch? Did they forget to move the cows out a day before or something? ;D
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Jan 10, 2004 20:20:46 GMT 1
don't argue lets just throw them out
|
|
|
Post by grinfish on Jan 10, 2004 20:24:36 GMT 1
Sure, why not!
After all, we have an excuse - a great bif F***off river! What's theirs - failure to upgrade from using the streets as open sewers?
;D
|
|
|
Post by GUEST on Jan 11, 2004 1:47:46 GMT 1
PILCH ,THAT BIT ABOUT ADMISSION PRICES-I THOUGHT THE CLUB SAID THAT THEY COULDNT REDUCE THEM WITHOUT MORECAMBE AGREEING,THIS SAYS WE COULDNT CHARGE MORE THAN A FIVER UNLESS THE OPPOSITION AGREE. PERHAPSTHE CLUB COULD CLARIFY THIS POINT BEFORE THE NEXT MATCH.
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Jan 11, 2004 2:54:38 GMT 1
i think what it said is the clubs have to come to a £ agreement with certain guidlines asap after the draw
i presume stfc faxed morecambe and asked 'keep it at full price shall we ?' and morecambe have agreed
had town suggested a cheaper price which was not to morecambes liking then i'm sure we would have heard about it
but...would more fans have come had it been cheaper ?
|
|