|
Post by x emz x on Jul 5, 2005 16:40:16 GMT 1
... but cant say ive noticed it george best im not saying he did it- but again you do have to wonder if they do things fairly these days-
|
|
|
Post by soupie on Jul 5, 2005 16:54:49 GMT 1
Did what?
|
|
|
Post by siabod on Jul 5, 2005 16:56:57 GMT 1
or it could have been a case of a woman spurned after her revenge.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2005 16:58:57 GMT 1
"you do have to wonder if they do things fairly these days"
Too true. Fancy having all that rubbish in the papers without any substantiating evidence. Hardly fair on Best is it? But that's not what you meant...
|
|
|
Post by john on Jul 5, 2005 17:00:47 GMT 1
Best acts like a wineo and is still a name, there are always going to be stories about the bloke, I mean he hardly knows what he does anyway.
TBH Im quite surprised he's still alive
|
|
|
Post by x emz x on Jul 5, 2005 17:08:32 GMT 1
"you do have to wonder if they do things fairly these days" Too true. Fancy having all that rubbish in the papers without any substantiating evidence. Hardly fair on Best is it? But that's not what you meant... i can see wot u mean... its probably not fair on him. but i mean... whenever a "big name" is involved, always gets me thinking as to if its all done fairly...thats all like with jackson- no 1 will ever know if he really truely did it, but if he had been found guilty- was it because he was guilty or because they felt they had 2. like being innocent, everyone thinks he was found innocent because of who he is... just dont know...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 5, 2005 17:11:06 GMT 1
I can see your point but I think with Best's well documented history any time any story like this comes out the majority of people will think he has done it which isn't fair on him. If the police had any evidence they would act, but there doesn't seem to be any.
|
|