|
Post by scooter on Mar 23, 2005 18:56:17 GMT 1
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2005 20:41:08 GMT 1
Ian - none of my questions were in there?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2005 20:43:47 GMT 1
Mine wasn't either
|
|
|
Post by El Huracán!!!! on Mar 23, 2005 20:46:41 GMT 1
Did you to happen to ask "difficult" questions though
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2005 21:13:42 GMT 1
Will be answered this time next month apparantly....
Q: After telling the fans that the club needed someone more capable than Mike Thomas to manage the commercial side of the club and appointing Mark Peters and Bill Wingrove, how to the club plan to address the current 'skills gap'?
Q: We have always been told the footprint cannot be changed. So how can the pitch be made bigger? Does this mean smaller stands?
Q: Why are we trying to reduce the height of the stadium. What pressure has been exerted on the club to do this and by who?
Q: What plans do the club have to make this stadium a more enjoyable matchday experience for the majority of the support?
Q: Are there any plans to have amber seats at the New Meadow?
|
|
|
Post by SeanBroseley on Mar 23, 2005 21:32:55 GMT 1
Expected that answer. What Keith Sayfritz needs to remember is that we - the fans of the football club - campaigned for this ground. I really would hate to think - really hate and despise - is that on the back of that work for our football club there was someone out there making a buck for sitting on the ownership of land that was more likely to be developed precisely because of the stadium getting planning permission at the adjacent plot. I have to say, whilst expecting that sort of reply, reading it does make me think, "can I trust the people running our football club." I do wonder.
|
|
|
Post by Carter on Mar 23, 2005 22:31:13 GMT 1
Something dodgy's up there with those answers -
Always been a little bit susipious about certain parties motives - this doesn't do anything to help.....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2005 23:02:25 GMT 1
Something dodgy's up there with those answers - Always been a little bit susipious about certain parties motives - this doesn't do anything to help..... Why did it take Keith so long, and why did he have to check with Judy, to say 'I can't answer that'. Guess we'll have to wait until the money from Jennings is released and then someone can do the necessary searching via the Land Reg.
|
|
|
Post by meoleshrew2 on Mar 23, 2005 23:05:26 GMT 1
I would have thought the answer on the land issue was obvious, but it would make sense not to make it public
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 23, 2005 23:08:58 GMT 1
I would have thought the answer on the land issue was obvious, but it would make sense not to make it public I honestly don't know?
|
|
|
Post by meoleshrew2 on Mar 23, 2005 23:39:38 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by rob on Mar 24, 2005 0:40:13 GMT 1
I dont understand either Gareth, it is rather concearning and very dissapointing in the extreme and the more i look at the questions asked and the ansers given the more i feel uncomfortable and the more i resent the lack of transparancy
|
|
|
Post by timgallon on Mar 24, 2005 0:44:27 GMT 1
Well its got to be (in part) Alsaka, they held the option with the farmer in the first place and paid out a lot of money to get us the New Meadow permission.
|
|
|
Post by ianwhit on Mar 24, 2005 0:48:32 GMT 1
Ian - none of my questions were in there? see shrewschat for the answer to that, or i'll cut n paste on here in the morning...
|
|
|
Post by ianwhit on Mar 24, 2005 0:50:39 GMT 1
Expected that answer. What Keith Sayfritz needs to remember is that we - the fans of the football club - campaigned for this ground. I really would hate to think - really hate and despise - is that on the back of that work for our football club there was someone out there making a buck for sitting on the ownership of land that was more likely to be developed precisely because of the stadium getting planning permission at the adjacent plot. I have to say, whilst expecting that sort of reply, reading it does make me think, "can I trust the people running our football club." I do wonder. sean, if you'd worded the question so you got the precise answer you wanted then he may have asked him. i did ask that question you wanted to ask and the answer is no.
|
|
|
Post by ianwhit on Mar 24, 2005 0:53:50 GMT 1
Why did it take Keith so long, and why did he have to check with Judy, to say 'I can't answer that'. it's a monthly q&a, last month he wanted to double check a couple of facts, this month he's answered it.. it slipped to the end of the month as i needed to ask the questions, macc game, then edit and type up, get them checked and then post, also as i was out of it for a week this didn't help.
|
|
|
Post by SeanBroseley on Mar 24, 2005 2:32:37 GMT 1
sean, if you'd worded the question so you got the precise answer you wanted then he may have asked him. i did ask that question you wanted to ask and the answer is no. Thank you for asking the question I asked Ian. The question I asked was the question I intended to ask.
|
|
|
Post by SeanBroseley on Mar 24, 2005 2:35:32 GMT 1
it's a monthly q&a, last month he wanted to double check a couple of facts, this month he's answered it.. Presumably the fact he was checking with regard to my question was whether or not he could answer it.
|
|
|
Post by SeanBroseley on Mar 24, 2005 2:44:44 GMT 1
Guess we'll have to wait until the money from Jennings is released and then someone can do the necessary searching via the Land Reg. The answer to the question about whether the new ground will be built sooner or later suggests the money has been paid. Presumably Keith checked the answer before giving it.
|
|
|
Post by ianwhit on Mar 24, 2005 8:31:52 GMT 1
Thank you for asking the question I asked Ian. The question I asked was the question I intended to ask. you didn't ask the direct question that you wanted the answer for though.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 24, 2005 10:12:58 GMT 1
Cheers Whits
|
|
|
Post by SeanBroseley on Mar 24, 2005 10:36:30 GMT 1
you didn't ask the direct question that you wanted the answer for though. OK Ian, I give up, what did I intend to ask?
|
|