SC or MT??

[Pilch]

Sept 16, 2024 9:56:01 GMT 1 ProudSalopian said:

Sept 16, 2024 9:01:00 GMT 1 @feedoknasher said:

Would also question how much of the unsustainable overspend was the managers fault given all his highly paid players have now departed and yet we allegedly still need cash injections to stay afloat.

Sounds like a broken business model to me.

Very good point. We've heard for 18 months how Cotterill & Caldwell ruined the club but thanks to the new model, we are now sustainable. But here we here, bringing in L2 players and still going over budget.

That's sounds a bit like running a football club

[Deleted]

More like running down a club.

[zenfootball2]

Sept 16, 2024 10:32:51 GMT 1 @tarporleyblue said:

More like running down a club.

And leaving it to stagnate

[Deleted]

Sept 16, 2024 10:35:14 GMT 1 zenfootball2 said:

Sept 16, 2024 10:32:51 GMT 1 @tarporleyblue said:

More like running down a club.

And leaving it to stagnate

More down to a Chairman who wants the money he loaned to the club back asap

It will be 18 months or so before we see the accounts for this season.One thing I will predict is a dramatic decrease in wages and all outgoings in comparison to recent seasons.

[venceremos]

ProudSalopian and DiglisShrew have encapsulated the essential points of this " debate" perfectly for me.

[Pilch]

Sept 16, 2024 9:50:17 GMT 1 DiglisShrew said:

I do wonder why some posters start threads like this that are currently irrelevant and must know that will reopen divisions among the fans ?? I do like debate but all wasted when it’s clear some fans are set in their minds whatever .

It doesn't matter what the topic is, it will end with the same few aiming digs at our chairman 😝

[Deleted]

Sept 16, 2024 13:00:15 GMT 1 venceremos said:

ProudSalopian and DiglisShrew have encapsulated the essential points of this " debate" perfectly for me.

I agree.

[hectord0g137]

The whole point of debate is one person thinks he's right and the other thinks he's wrong ,and the discussion goes back and forth. There should never be a total impasse

[davycrockett]

Maybe we need to draw FGR or Wealdstone in the cup then we could add PH to the debate? 

[Deleted]

Sept 16, 2024 16:35:33 GMT 1 hectord0g137 said:

The whole point of debate is one person thinks he's right and the other thinks he's wrong ,and the discussion goes back and forth. There should never be a total impasse

Eventually you have to accept and respect that others may have an opinion that differs from your own, and not go after them every time this sort of debate comes up. It’s pretty simple messageboard etiquette really.

[Deleted]

Sept 16, 2024 17:02:11 GMT 1 @feedoknasher said:

Sept 16, 2024 16:35:33 GMT 1 hectord0g137 said:

The whole point of debate is one person thinks he's right and the other thinks he's wrong ,and the discussion goes back and forth. There should never be a total impasse

Eventually you have to accept and respect that others may have an opinion that differs from your own, and not go after them every time this sort of debate comes up. It’s pretty simple messageboard etiquette really.

If only 😉

[Pilch]

Sept 16, 2024 17:02:11 GMT 1 @feedoknasher said:

Sept 16, 2024 16:35:33 GMT 1 hectord0g137 said:

The whole point of debate is one person thinks he's right and the other thinks he's wrong ,and the discussion goes back and forth. There should never be a total impasse

Eventually you have to accept and respect that others may have an opinion that differs from your own, and not go after them every time this sort of debate comes up. It’s pretty simple messageboard etiquette really.

then why did you try and say this shouldn't be a serious question,  and then introduce the current situation into the debate

thats not etiquette ,  just saying

[dibblydobbly]

Sept 16, 2024 17:32:42 GMT 1 Pilch said:

Sept 16, 2024 17:02:11 GMT 1 @feedoknasher said:

Eventually you have to accept and respect that others may have an opinion that differs from your own, and not go after them every time this sort of debate comes up. It’s pretty simple messageboard etiquette really.

then why did you try and say this shouldn't be a serious question,  and then introduce the current situation into the debate

thats not etiquette ,  just saying

Oh dear

Beginning to wish I had never mentioned it

[DiglisShrew]

Sept 16, 2024 17:50:07 GMT 1 dibblydobbly said:

Sept 16, 2024 17:32:42 GMT 1 Pilch said:

then why did you try and say this shouldn't be a serious question,  and then introduce the current situation into the debate

thats not etiquette ,  just saying

Oh dear

Beginning to wish I had never mentioned it

You’ll learn !!🙄😉

[Pilch]

Sept 16, 2024 17:50:07 GMT 1 dibblydobbly said:

Sept 16, 2024 17:32:42 GMT 1 Pilch said:

then why did you try and say this shouldn't be a serious question,  and then introduce the current situation into the debate

thats not etiquette ,  just saying

Oh dear

Beginning to wish I had never mentioned it

it was a fair question in my opinion,  and a simple one to understand too,    just 2 options   SC or MT ?

maybe make it a bit easier next time 

[Deleted]

Everyone moves on even Steve Cotterill and Matt Taylor.

[ProudSalopian]

Sept 16, 2024 17:50:07 GMT 1 dibblydobbly said:

Sept 16, 2024 17:32:42 GMT 1 Pilch said:

then why did you try and say this shouldn't be a serious question,  and then introduce the current situation into the debate

thats not etiquette ,  just saying

Oh dear

Beginning to wish I had never mentioned it

Let's be honest, it was inevitable where it would lead. The question was do you prefer Steve Cotterill (departing in mysterious circumstances and leaving us in a mess financially) versus Matt Taylor (appointed unexpectedly, working under financial constrants and then sacked within 6 months) . Of course people are going to bring up the circumstances surrounding their time with us and the nature of the arrivals & departures.