|
Post by OswestrySalopian on Apr 6, 2011 15:39:27 GMT 1
Deducted 1 point and a £10,000 fine.
|
|
|
Post by elmundo on Apr 6, 2011 15:47:12 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by elmundo on Apr 6, 2011 15:47:49 GMT 1
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2011 15:56:22 GMT 1
Adds more importance to their game against us.
|
|
|
Post by Amsterdammer on Apr 6, 2011 15:56:38 GMT 1
More interesting that Torquay only deducted one point. How was there's different? Owning up?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2011 15:59:07 GMT 1
What do they have to appeal about? A one point deduction and £10,000 fine is about the best they could have hoped for.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2011 16:00:39 GMT 1
Hereford won the match so have had the 3 points for the victory deducted.
|
|
|
Post by Rusholme Ruffian on Apr 6, 2011 16:01:15 GMT 1
They've done well out of that.
|
|
|
Post by northwestman on Apr 6, 2011 16:02:10 GMT 1
ONE POINT!!!!!!!!
What a pathetic decision. They might as well have let them get away with it.
|
|
|
Post by Rusholme Ruffian on Apr 6, 2011 16:02:51 GMT 1
How do you come to the conclusion its Hereford 3 and Torquay 1. Doesn't really add up. At least the fine is the same, couldn't really make that different!
|
|
|
Post by ratcliffesghost on Apr 6, 2011 16:03:47 GMT 1
How wonderfully Tinpot
|
|
|
Post by northwestman on Apr 6, 2011 16:04:37 GMT 1
Hereford have been deducted 3 points.
|
|
|
Post by Lord Ha Ha on Apr 6, 2011 16:20:22 GMT 1
That is a shambolic decision. If Hereford are deducted three points then so should Torquay. The result should not have been relevant as the fine is for the actual offence. If I was Hereford I would appeal using that arguement.
|
|
|
Post by petetheloon on Apr 6, 2011 16:33:20 GMT 1
Hereford should be deducted 4 points.
they should have the 1 point deduction torquay should have had and the 3 points deducted for the win over them. Thus rendering the game void and both taking the same points deduction.
|
|
|
Post by El Huracán!!!! on Apr 6, 2011 16:36:18 GMT 1
The FA seem to have done a strange thing,
Seem like other to me that the sensible thing was to void the game
Hereford - 3
Then dock both teams a point for the rule break
so
Hereford -4 Torquay -1
However add to that that this was Torquays second transgression of the rule and there is justification for docking Torqauy a point or two more...
All helps us put them 4 behind us now I think which is better than three... Hereford got away with a point IMO
|
|
H&A
Shropshire County League
Posts: 29
|
Post by H&A on Apr 6, 2011 16:48:48 GMT 1
they have 28 days to appeal...
so a decision might not be finalised until 3-May. the points will stay until the appeal is complete!
|
|
|
Post by Lord Ha Ha on Apr 6, 2011 17:04:02 GMT 1
Sod sensible, lets go for the selfish fine!
Hereford to get a suspended 10 point deduction if they dare to take points off us when we play them. Torquay to be deducted just enough points so they will finish below us this season whatever happens.
|
|
|
Post by El Huracán!!!! on Apr 6, 2011 17:12:16 GMT 1
Its like the FA with the QPR situation... Despite chargeing QPR with problems related to third party ownership of one of there players in OCTOBER, they have faffed and faffed and held off making the call on the problem untill guess when? The week of the last games of the season.... If QPR get a points deduction the last week of the season it will be chaos in the Championship... as there are implications as the player played in a number of games which would on the evidence of the Hereofrd/Torquay situation need to be voided? ? Good old FA eh!
|
|
|
Post by Ned on Apr 6, 2011 17:26:31 GMT 1
Ah, there is a God
|
|
|
Post by Ned on Apr 6, 2011 17:38:17 GMT 1
Hereford have been deducted 3 points. I'm already on the way to the shop to get the beers in
|
|
|
Post by bertymax on Apr 6, 2011 17:52:59 GMT 1
Not surprised really. They did lose the game in question after all, hence Hereford's 3 point deduction.
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Apr 6, 2011 18:05:13 GMT 1
good old jake
earned them -1 point from that game ;-)
|
|
|
Post by bertymax on Apr 6, 2011 18:05:54 GMT 1
I was hoping they'd have nothing much to play for when we meet at Edgar St but they're right back in the s**t now, this may backfire against us, the fallout from Robinson's loan switch may not yet be over.
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Apr 6, 2011 18:09:10 GMT 1
just merging the 2 threads to see what chaos it causes
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2011 18:22:04 GMT 1
Hereford have been deducted 3 points. I'm already on the way to the shop to get the beers in I don't see it as a good thing.
|
|
bradley
Midland League Division Two
Posts: 188
|
Post by bradley on Apr 6, 2011 19:07:32 GMT 1
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2011 19:36:52 GMT 1
They obviously looked at the match score and docked points accordingly. If it had finished 0-0 both clubs would have just been fined.
|
|
|
Post by scooter on Apr 6, 2011 20:21:26 GMT 1
They obviously looked at the match score and docked points accordingly. If it had finished 0-0 both clubs would have just been fined. I assume they would both have docked one point if it had been a draw, but I don't think the result should have mattered - they both broke the same rules and the punishment should have been the same, what ever it was
|
|
|
Post by heavenlyshrew on Apr 6, 2011 20:43:06 GMT 1
The way i see it is that Hereford have just got a away with a small fine while Torquay have lost a point hardly fair is it
|
|
|
Post by venceremos on Apr 7, 2011 17:45:35 GMT 1
The way i see it is that Hereford have just got a away with a small fine while Torquay have lost a point hardly fair is it It's only unfair on Torquay if you ignore the fact that the game was played and Hereford won 3 points, which they've now lost. Unless that match is void, Hereford should come out of it with more than Torquay. I think Hartlepool were deducted 3 points and fined £10k for playing an ineligible player last season. They'd won the game, so Hereford's outcome is consistent with that case. What puzzles me is why Torquay's offence is treated more leniently. Surely the principle is what's being judged, regardless of the outcome of the game? If we can have inflexible tariffs for players' yellow and red cards, surely we could have a starting point of a 3 point deduction and fine (first offence) for an ineligible player? Appeals should be allowed but at least we'd all know where we stood and what to expect. The current system is a bit of a mess for everyone - the clubs, their opponents, the fans etc.
|
|