|
Post by penza on Mar 2, 2011 16:27:41 GMT 1
Was it that bad? We created 3 or 4 VERY good chances which should have been buried, Bury had 3 shots on target and scored 3 goals? It could have been 4-3 on a better day! We were in the game until the 2nd goal where we started to lose our way a bit, this is when changes should have been made. Massive overreaction to what was a poor result, but one that doesn't give a true reflection of the game in my opinion. COYB. Spot on. Totally agree, the game could quite easily have gon our way on another day. We were as good if not better than Bury for a good chunk of the game, up until there 2nd goal anyway. We had two chances at the start of the second half that changed the game, they go in and its a different game. We then conceded and got caught out in the last 20 minutes by a very good side and only conceded the 3rd goal due to a stunning strike. Even before that we could have got back into it if Wroe's effort had gone inside the post. Very fine margins between a win a 3-0 loss although its hard to swallow we were decent last night and got to look towards the next game and get the result out of our system. Big overeaction by some fans last night because of the result, yes it was a bad result but we played fairly well. We've played much worse and won games this season.
|
|
|
Post by southshropblue on Mar 2, 2011 17:58:04 GMT 1
Starting the thread I never implied it was the worst performance ever nor did I over react i think there are some valid questions though about the subs ,the performance,the poor set pieces, we did start pretty well but on chances I would have thought 5-3 to Bury would have been about right
|
|
|
Post by The Shropshire Tenor on Mar 2, 2011 18:04:13 GMT 1
With hindsight, the release of O'Donnell looks premature.
I thought we were good, apart from finishing, until Bury got their second, then I was worried about how easily heads went down.
|
|