Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 25, 2010 8:56:37 GMT 1
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 25, 2010 9:08:50 GMT 1
|
|
oranjemob
Midland League Division One
Posts: 486
|
Post by oranjemob on May 25, 2010 9:12:52 GMT 1
It's so easy to appear competent, honourable etc when you're not accountable
|
|
|
Post by Amsterdammer on May 25, 2010 9:33:12 GMT 1
Coalitions may well be here to say, so politicians will probably watch their language in future and also what they say about each other. Agree it is funny, but we best get used to this kind of thing. I wonder if the journalists would like the whole thing to collapse.
|
|
|
Post by Minor on May 25, 2010 9:41:59 GMT 1
I think you will find, that is standard police procedure for the Queens opening of Parliament.............its called security for the building and surrounding area.
|
|
|
Post by der kaiser on May 25, 2010 9:50:51 GMT 1
What does Nick Clegg stand for?
David Cameron entering the room.
|
|
|
Post by monkee on May 25, 2010 11:08:41 GMT 1
I think you will find, that is standard police procedure for the Queens opening of Parliament.............its called security for the building and surrounding area. utter rubbish, Haw has been there for years, doing no harm and protesting. if you didnt think they were the nasty party before, they are starting to prove it again. i think it is also good evidence that the tories are pushing the liberals aside, as it wouldnt be their sort of thing to aggressively arrest an old man.
|
|
|
Post by Minor on May 25, 2010 11:34:42 GMT 1
I think you will find, that is standard police procedure for the Queens opening of Parliament.............its called security for the building and surrounding area. utter rubbish, Haw has been there for years, doing no harm and protesting. if you didnt think they were the nasty party before, they are starting to prove it again. i think it is also good evidence that the tories are pushing the liberals aside, as it wouldnt be their sort of thing to aggressively arrest an old man. Of course that sort of thing didn't go on under the Labour Govt. did it news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4293502.stm
|
|
|
Post by monkee on May 25, 2010 11:39:56 GMT 1
utter rubbish, Haw has been there for years, doing no harm and protesting. if you didnt think they were the nasty party before, they are starting to prove it again. i think it is also good evidence that the tories are pushing the liberals aside, as it wouldnt be their sort of thing to aggressively arrest an old man. Of course that sort of thing didn't go on under the Labour Govt. did it news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4293502.stmyes that was terrible too, but that makes it ok for the tory party? you see, this is why we cant have rational politics in this country, people like yourself would rather play tit for tat than actually sort the country out properly.
|
|
LufbraSalop
Midland League Division One
. [H:3]
Posts: 468
|
Post by LufbraSalop on May 25, 2010 11:43:20 GMT 1
utter rubbish, Haw has been there for years, doing no harm and protesting. if you didnt think they were the nasty party before, they are starting to prove it again. i think it is also good evidence that the tories are pushing the liberals aside, as it wouldnt be their sort of thing to aggressively arrest an old man. Yes i'm sure David Cameron personally helped remove Haw from the camp while Nick Clegg stood at the side sobbing " don't do it Dave, its not worth it"! Whats utter rubbish is linking this directly with the coalition when its a GLA/Met issue and caracaturing the political parties involved as nice or nasty! Good evidence my arse
|
|
|
Post by monkee on May 25, 2010 11:46:56 GMT 1
utter rubbish, Haw has been there for years, doing no harm and protesting. if you didnt think they were the nasty party before, they are starting to prove it again. i think it is also good evidence that the tories are pushing the liberals aside, as it wouldnt be their sort of thing to aggressively arrest an old man. Yes i'm sure David Cameron personally helped remove Haw from the camp while Nick Clegg stood at the side sobbing " don't do it Dave, its not worth it"! Whats utter rubbish is linking this directly with the coalition when its a GLA/Met issue and caracaturing the political parties involved as nice or nasty! Good evidence my arse whatever chap, you believe what you want but you are seriously telling me that a chap that has been there for literally years, and who gets removed, has nothing to do the very recent change in government? maybe it was the tooth fairy or father christmas eh?
|
|
LufbraSalop
Midland League Division One
. [H:3]
Posts: 468
|
Post by LufbraSalop on May 25, 2010 11:58:58 GMT 1
whatever chap, you believe what you want but you are seriously telling me that a chap that has been there for literally years, and who gets removed, has nothing to do the very recent change in government? maybe it was the tooth fairy or father christmas eh? The authorities have been trying to get rid of him for years and since May 1st the camp has grown significantly. If you think the cabinet are spending their time worrying about a protester, then thats fine, but i think they've got abit more on at the moment. Its also funny that in one post you label the entire Tory party as "nasty" because of a case that, at best, is indirectly linked to the new government, and then in the next accuss Minor of playing 'tit for tat'. You can't have it both ways mate!
|
|
|
Post by Minor on May 25, 2010 12:01:12 GMT 1
Yes i'm sure David Cameron personally helped remove Haw from the camp while Nick Clegg stood at the side sobbing " don't do it Dave, its not worth it"! Whats utter rubbish is linking this directly with the coalition when its a GLA/Met issue and caracaturing the political parties involved as nice or nasty! Good evidence my arse whatever chap, you believe what you want but you are seriously telling me that a chap that has been there for literally years, and who gets removed, has nothing to do the very recent change in government? maybe it was the tooth fairy or father christmas eh? But in all honesty who gives a flying you know what about his little 'peace' protest He's helping the Country sat on his ar$e for 9 years.
|
|
|
Post by monkee on May 25, 2010 12:08:29 GMT 1
whatever chap, you believe what you want but you are seriously telling me that a chap that has been there for literally years, and who gets removed, has nothing to do the very recent change in government? maybe it was the tooth fairy or father christmas eh? The authorities have been trying to get rid of him for years and since May 1st the camp has grown significantly. If you think the cabinet are spending their time worrying about a protester, then thats fine, but i think they've got abit more on at the moment. Its also funny that in one post you label the entire Tory party as "nasty" because of a case that, at best, is indirectly linked to the new government, and then in the next accuss Minor of playing 'tit for tat'. You can't have it both ways mate! i think you may have mistaken me for a labour supporter. the tory party have been the nasty party for a number of years, short memory?
|
|
|
Post by monkee on May 25, 2010 12:09:55 GMT 1
whatever chap, you believe what you want but you are seriously telling me that a chap that has been there for literally years, and who gets removed, has nothing to do the very recent change in government? maybe it was the tooth fairy or father christmas eh? But in all honesty who gives a flying you know what about his little 'peace' protest obviously someone in power has a problem with it so someone gives a flying you know what
|
|
LufbraSalop
Midland League Division One
. [H:3]
Posts: 468
|
Post by LufbraSalop on May 25, 2010 12:16:02 GMT 1
The authorities have been trying to get rid of him for years and since May 1st the camp has grown significantly. If you think the cabinet are spending their time worrying about a protester, then thats fine, but i think they've got abit more on at the moment. Its also funny that in one post you label the entire Tory party as "nasty" because of a case that, at best, is indirectly linked to the new government, and then in the next accuss Minor of playing 'tit for tat'. You can't have it both ways mate! i think you may have mistaken me for a labour supporter. the tory party have been the nasty party for a number of years, short memory? And how many of the current cabinet were ministers during the Thatcher government?
|
|
|
Post by monkee on May 25, 2010 12:18:09 GMT 1
i think you may have mistaken me for a labour supporter. the tory party have been the nasty party for a number of years, short memory? And how many of the current cabinet were ministers during the Thatcher government? and thats relevant in what way? if anything it backs up the nasty party image. even with a massive change of staff, they still manage to do something nasty within a couple of weeks
|
|
LufbraSalop
Midland League Division One
. [H:3]
Posts: 468
|
Post by LufbraSalop on May 25, 2010 12:21:38 GMT 1
And how many of the current cabinet were ministers during the Thatcher government? and thats relevant in what way? if anything it backs up the nasty party image. even with a massive change of staff, they still manage to do something nasty within a couple of weeks So if it's not anything to do with Thatcher, why are they nasty?
|
|
|
Post by mrbunny on May 25, 2010 12:34:33 GMT 1
And Labour letting the debt grow ridiculously each year was a good idea was it?
|
|
|
Post by WindsorShrew on May 25, 2010 12:47:43 GMT 1
Lol enjoy your fun Pab. 1. The guy that has been moved on is a tramp who has created a cesspit outside our Parliament building, good riddance. 2. Secondly can I draw your attention to the 2005 Labour Party Conference when an 82 year old man was arersted under the anit terrorism laws for saying "no" at the Partys conference. Up yours you crossdressing leftie non hetrosexual. Equal rights for dwarfs !
|
|
|
Post by monkee on May 25, 2010 12:49:21 GMT 1
and thats relevant in what way? if anything it backs up the nasty party image. even with a massive change of staff, they still manage to do something nasty within a couple of weeks So if it's not anything to do with Thatcher, why are they nasty? i think you must be confused as i never mentioned Mrs Thatcher, or being a labour supporter.
|
|
|
Post by SeanBroseley on May 25, 2010 12:52:30 GMT 1
And Labour letting the debt grow ridiculously each year was a good idea was it? Wrong. It didn't grow ridiculously high each year. Try again.
|
|
|
Post by SeanBroseley on May 25, 2010 12:53:59 GMT 1
Lol enjoy your fun Pab. 1. The guy that has been moved on is a tramp who has created a cesspit outside our Parliament building, good riddance. 2. Secondly can I draw your attention to the 2005 Labour Party Conference when an 82 year old man was arersted under the anit terrorism laws for saying "no" at the Partys conference. Up yours you crossdressing leftie non hetrosexual. Equal rights for dwarfs ! He's not been moved on. His tent has been searched and he got arrested when he didn't get out quick enough to let the police in.
|
|
LufbraSalop
Midland League Division One
. [H:3]
Posts: 468
|
Post by LufbraSalop on May 25, 2010 13:01:42 GMT 1
So if it's not anything to do with Thatcher, why are they nasty? i think you must be confused as i never mentioned Mrs Thatcher, or being a labour supporter. Ok, but why do you think they are nasty?
|
|
|
Post by monkee on May 25, 2010 13:09:51 GMT 1
i think you must be confused as i never mentioned Mrs Thatcher, or being a labour supporter. Ok, but why do you think they are nasty? Link------> said by one of their own the fact that they needed a partner to get into government because they werent popular enough to do it alone, suggests that they still havent shaken off the image
|
|
|
Post by mrbunny on May 25, 2010 13:17:46 GMT 1
And Labour letting the debt grow ridiculously each year was a good idea was it? Wrong. It didn't grow ridiculously high each year. Try again. Oops it went ridiculously high in 1.Sorry forgot.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 25, 2010 13:23:59 GMT 1
Pike, shouldnt you be getting some sleep??? yes Labour got up to all sorts of silly things, the old chap at the conference was just one example. as i recall i got lambasted good and proper to! but this is the Nu Politics. A new kind of government, a new way of doing things so far they have said they will cut government spending bureaucracy and qango's, and have set up two qango's, each headed by a bureaucrat, to do it they are going to protect peoples jobs and cut the welfare budget.....by making people redundant and putting them on the dole 5 more years!!!!!!! (regardless of what parliament or the people think)
|
|
|
Post by SeanBroseley on May 25, 2010 13:27:19 GMT 1
Wrong. It didn't grow ridiculously high each year. Try again. Oops it went ridiculously high in 1.Sorry forgot. Compared to the banking system collapsing in 2008 - discuss.
|
|
|
Post by mrbunny on May 25, 2010 13:28:54 GMT 1
Oops it went ridiculously high in 1.Sorry forgot. Compared to the banking system collapsing in 2008 - discuss. So you are basically saying a recession under the Conservatives was the Conservatives fault yet a recession under Labour (the worst ever) was nothing to do with them whatsoever. Go figure.
|
|
|
Post by SeanBroseley on May 25, 2010 13:33:54 GMT 1
Compared to the banking system collapsing in 2008 - discuss. So you are basically saying a recession under the Conservatives was the Conservatives fault yet a recession under Labour (the worst ever) was nothing to do with them whatsoever. Go figure. Yer wha? Voices in your head mate.
|
|