|
Post by gregtheshrew on Mar 27, 2004 18:51:37 GMT 1
Banim missed a sitter now
|
|
|
Post by Young_Shrewster on Mar 27, 2004 18:53:10 GMT 1
Right greg the shrew! I am personaly starting a thread for you to write all the things you want to in there, with out starting another thread allthe time!
|
|
|
Post by gregtheshrew on Mar 27, 2004 18:54:38 GMT 1
stop moaning ;D
|
|
|
Post by R6ix on Mar 27, 2004 19:01:07 GMT 1
we just aint good enuff ? a long way short, rodgers is a hindirance for us i feel, darby isnt prolific enough, id play cramb up front in a 442
|
|
|
Post by dom in texas on Mar 27, 2004 19:03:56 GMT 1
does cramb have the required workrate to do that away from home though?
maybe thats why he was on the bench today....agree about luke though. Its Luke or nothing when he gets the ball...... :-((
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 27, 2004 19:04:03 GMT 1
Rodgers now has 4 in 22. Defenders have the measure of him on the whole and I don't think he warrants a starting place. He can have as many shots as he likes, strikers are there to score and he isn't.
|
|
|
Post by SeanBroseley on Mar 27, 2004 19:05:06 GMT 1
From what I could tell from the commentary we pushed a better team all the way at their place.
That standard of performance has to be repeated to get in the play-offs From the season we have had there's no reason to think it will be. That was a wasted game in hand on Aldershot.
Conceding early goals is becoming a habit - wake up defence.
|
|
|
Post by dom in texas on Mar 27, 2004 19:06:39 GMT 1
early goals conceeded at the start of both halves today is a concern.
Away form will cost us this season, we are throwing away the playoff berth we had.....
|
|
|
Post by R6ix on Mar 27, 2004 19:10:13 GMT 1
over the course of the season we aint good enough to beat the top 5 sides so i feel we probably wont finnish there as we aint good enough, if only JQ had played the basics from the start of the season instead of fancy tactics, we may have become a solid effective top 5 side?
|
|