|
fao pab
Mar 19, 2004 20:07:35 GMT 1
Post by faginy on Mar 19, 2004 20:07:35 GMT 1
Sorry faginey mate but comparing Rogers and Crumb is a bit daft. Rogers works his little brommy bells off for 90 minutes, chases every ball and causes defences all sorts of problems. thats all well and good, and of course I know that Rodgers is a quality player, but in the cold hard light of day he has only scored in 6 matches this season.........so does 'working his little brommy bells off for 90 minutes' really get him anywhere? i dont want to start a cramb v rodgers debate, I was just proving that crambs record this season is better than rodgers. knowledge is the bomb, and i thank you
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
fao pab
Mar 19, 2004 20:11:27 GMT 1
Post by Deleted on Mar 19, 2004 20:11:27 GMT 1
Hmm
League
Cramb 23 starts 4 subs 12 goals
Luke 20 starts 5 subs 11 goals
His record doesn't look better to me!
|
|
|
fao pab
Mar 19, 2004 20:17:59 GMT 1
Post by Young_Shrewster on Mar 19, 2004 20:17:59 GMT 1
|
|
|
fao pab
Mar 19, 2004 20:18:21 GMT 1
Post by faginy on Mar 19, 2004 20:18:21 GMT 1
Hmm League Cramb 23 starts 4 subs 12 goals Luke 20 starts 5 subs 11 goals His record doesn't look better to me! bugger (what happens if you include the cups?)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
fao pab
Mar 19, 2004 20:19:09 GMT 1
Post by Deleted on Mar 19, 2004 20:19:09 GMT 1
We're out of the cups faginy
|
|
|
fao pab
Mar 19, 2004 21:08:09 GMT 1
Post by d00bie on Mar 19, 2004 21:08:09 GMT 1
LOL, jeevsey reminds me of Father Jack (not in looks of course) but when he wakes up from one of his alchohol binges, and shouts [glow=red,2,300]WHAT D'YA MEAN WERE OUT OF THE FECKING TROPHY[/glow]
|
|