Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 17, 2022 10:00:33 GMT 1
Thank you Pilch👍 So to confirm, despite all the appalling and vile accusations and scandal around the pervy prince, and the shame and humiliation he has brought upon the royal family that so many of you fawn over, in the last two and a half years there’s been under two pages of discussion. On the other hand, harry and megan who made the shocking decision to have there own lives outside the royal family currently have 21 pages. Sounds like a vendetta to me. if the couple had just left to have a life outside the royal family so they could have a new life in america and were building up there media profile to secure there finanical future you would hope most people would be happy for them but that has not been the case and i would think a combination of the opra interview ,the book deal briefing through friends and not coming to prince phillips memorial has not helped but equally the mail has clearly got a vendetta gainst them , as for prince andrew he has shown himself to be an odious individual and is fortunate not to be in jail . Yes you would hope wouldn’t you. Prince Charles has done several interviews about his hopes and ambitions and interests over the years, and is known for several outspoken views. Prince Phillip was an outspoken rude and often racist individual who was greatly loved despite it all by many. The treatment of these was quite stark in its contrast.
|
|
|
Post by zenfootball2 on Apr 17, 2022 10:08:08 GMT 1
if the couple had just left to have a life outside the royal family so they could have a new life in america and were building up there media profile to secure there finanical future you would hope most people would be happy for them but that has not been the case and i would think a combination of the opra interview ,the book deal briefing through friends and not coming to prince phillips memorial has not helped but equally the mail has clearly got a vendetta gainst them , as for prince andrew he has shown himself to be an odious individual and is fortunate not to be in jail . Yes you would hope wouldn’t you. Prince Charles has done several interviews about his hopes and ambitions and interests over the years, and is known for several outspoken views. Prince Phillip was an outspoken rude and often racist individual who was greatly loved despite it all by many. The treatment of these was quite stark in its contrast. i agree with you
|
|
|
Post by venceremos on Apr 18, 2022 11:29:24 GMT 1
They really aren't. I'm not interested in the royal family's doings, any more than I'm interested in Emmerdale or EastEnders, but even I can spot that Harry is not a Nazi sympathiser (despite his past fancy dress of choice) and admirer of fascist leaders. What exactly is Harry's 'treachery'? Nothing to do with fascism of course, but the giving up of royal duties and forever afterwards complaining about his 'ill-treatment' by the Royal Family and the fact that his wife could never be called HRH, have many parallels. Have you read the book? Life's too short. As I indicated, the monarchy and its doings are a soap opera to me, and carry as much intrinsic interest. Although that period of history does interest me, the tiny part played by the abdicated British monarch and his partner are on the same level of importance to it as that of our monarchy's role in the future of Europe.
|
|
|
Post by severnaside on Apr 18, 2022 11:32:28 GMT 1
Nothing to do with fascism of course, but the giving up of royal duties and forever afterwards complaining about his 'ill-treatment' by the Royal Family and the fact that his wife could never be called HRH, have many parallels. Have you read the book? Life's too short. As I indicated, the monarchy and its doings are a soap opera to me, and carry as much intrinsic interest. Although that period of history does interest me, the tiny part played by the abdicated British monarch and his partner are on the same level of importance to it as that of our monarchy's role in the future of Europe. Life evidently 'too short' to educate yourself before making pronouncements from a position of complete ignorance.
|
|
|
Post by venceremos on Apr 18, 2022 11:41:10 GMT 1
Life's too short. As I indicated, the monarchy and its doings are a soap opera to me, and carry as much intrinsic interest. Although that period of history does interest me, the tiny part played by the abdicated British monarch and his partner are on the same level of importance to it as that of our monarchy's role in the future of Europe. Life evidently 'too short' to educate yourself before making pronouncements from a position of complete ignorance. Oh grow up, you silly twerp. You've read a book and seen a film that I'm not interested in and now you're the go-to expert and I'm not allowed to have an opinion? Anyway, since you're proclaiming yourself to be so knowledgeable, how about answering my original question instead of being abusive. I'll repeat it so you don't even have to look it up: What exactly is Harry's 'treachery'? I'm waiting to learn from the master .....
|
|
|
Post by zenfootball2 on Apr 18, 2022 12:04:00 GMT 1
there is a picture of harry driving the four by four with meghan in the front and he stoped both front windows were down as he high fived some youngsters by the road, whilst a nice thing to do , im sure his private security team must have been having a meltdown, one gun or hand grenade and things would be looking very different .
|
|
|
Post by severnaside on Apr 18, 2022 13:16:18 GMT 1
Life evidently 'too short' to educate yourself before making pronouncements from a position of complete ignorance. Oh grow up, you silly twerp. You've read a book and seen a film that I'm not interested in and now you're the go-to expert and I'm not allowed to have an opinion? Anyway, since you're proclaiming yourself to be so knowledgeable, how about answering my original question instead of being abusive. I'll repeat it so you don't even have to look it up: What exactly is Harry's 'treachery'? I'm waiting to learn from the master ..... Let me see.........'grow up you silly twerp'.........and you accuse me of being abusive? You couldn't make it up. Since you refuse all attempts to educate yourself, I will endeavour to make it clearer for you. My initial post on this thread was simply as follows; 'The parallels between the film and book - 'The Traitor King' about the Duke of Windsor and Prince Harry are amazing.'
I never mentioned the word 'treachery'...the 'Traitor King' is merely the title of the book which recounts the entire personal and public life of the Duke of Windsor, not just his 1930's dalliance with the the Nazi party. Before you jumped in with you ill-considered comments about 'where's the treachery'....if you had perhaps made the time to read the book I referenced, then you may have learned that the parallels to which I referred, related to the issue of a member of the Royal Family deciding to step away from the family and their responsibilities, yet continue to complain and criticise for the rest of their lives that they were not being treated as royals with the attendant titles etc. Life is never too short to educate yourself.
|
|
|
Post by staffordshrew on Apr 18, 2022 13:30:00 GMT 1
Life's too short. As I indicated, the monarchy and its doings are a soap opera to me, and carry as much intrinsic interest. Although that period of history does interest me, the tiny part played by the abdicated British monarch and his partner are on the same level of importance to it as that of our monarchy's role in the future of Europe. Life evidently 'too short' to educate yourself before making pronouncements from a position of complete ignorance. If u was educkated wot wud u be doin bein one o them Tory types. U'ed av more sense.
|
|