|
|
Post by northwestman on Jan 21, 2021 18:49:53 GMT 1
Correct decision to allow the goal. From Law 11 (Offside) A player in an offside position receiving the ball from an opponent who deliberately plays the ball, including by deliberate handball, is not considered to have gained an advantage, unless it was a deliberate save by any opponent. I think most fans would agree that it’s not right seeing players coming back from that far offside and affecting the play. Just doesn’t sit right. I think Dean Smith might well agree with you! |
|
|
|
Post by harboroughshrew on Jan 21, 2021 19:38:12 GMT 1
I think these highly paid managers should actually know the laws of the game before they start insulting the referees.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Jan 21, 2021 20:06:01 GMT 1
I think these highly paid managers should actually know the laws of the game before they start insulting the referees. its a pathetic rule , and im not sure it was designed for what happened at city we've seen brilliant goals ruled out because someones toe nail is offside and yet you can be 20 yards offside, put the opponent under pressure take the ball off him and become onside its the equivalent of rugby game allowing a try from quarterback style throw to a player under the posts  |
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Jan 21, 2021 21:58:17 GMT 1
good old VAR deliberatly kicking an opponent is violent conduct and a sending off offence Except rule 23, clause 3.2 if the player involved is wearing a liverpool kit then any other decision is acceptable my mate fabinho again went for the ball maybe ? |
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Jan 21, 2021 22:52:33 GMT 1
pope recieves the match ball ;-)  klopps at the wheel ;-)  |
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Jan 26, 2021 21:39:38 GMT 1
shame andy gray isn't still commentating ;-)
|
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Jan 27, 2021 22:13:49 GMT 1
VAR and the officials as amusing as ever tonight
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
VAR again
Jan 28, 2021 10:32:48 GMT 1
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Jan 28, 2021 10:32:48 GMT 1
VAR and the officials as amusing as ever tonight Now that Liverpool won’t win the league is it just VAR is rubbish rather than VAR is corrupt? |
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Jan 28, 2021 10:40:43 GMT 1
VAR and the officials as amusing as ever tonight Now that Liverpool won’t win the league is it just VAR is rubbish rather than VAR is corrupt? last couple of weeks has proved what a shambles VAR has caused lino flags too early lino flags too late ref blows whistle ref doesnt blow whistle VAR checks goal VAR doesnt check goal the only consistancey is VAR ignores Fabhino red card VAR ignores Fabhino red card VAR ignores Fabhino red card |
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Feb 2, 2021 23:02:03 GMT 1
VAR spoiling the game again
|
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Feb 6, 2021 20:27:15 GMT 1
oh dear, it gets worse
|
|
|
|
VAR again
Feb 6, 2021 20:29:39 GMT 1
via mobile
Post by welshdan on Feb 6, 2021 20:29:39 GMT 1
Mike Dean is shocking. Soucek lifts arm to stop Mitrovic grabbing him, accidental contact... red card after 246 slow mo replays... It does feel like certain refs look for an excuse to get involved |
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Feb 6, 2021 20:40:31 GMT 1
Mike Dean is shocking. Soucek lifts arm to stop Mitrovic grabbing him, accidental contact... red card after 246 slow mo replays... It does feel like certain refs look for an excuse to get involved exactly, all those replays and was still obviously none the wiser so dishes out a 3+ game ban |
|
|
|
VAR again
Feb 6, 2021 21:59:31 GMT 1
via mobile
Post by chirkshrew on Feb 6, 2021 21:59:31 GMT 1
You knew it was gonna happen with MIKE DEAN
|
|
|
|
VAR again
Feb 6, 2021 22:00:51 GMT 1
via mobile
Post by South Stand Salopian on Feb 6, 2021 22:00:51 GMT 1
You knew it was gonna happen with MIKE DEAN Worst Premier League ref I have to say, this last week proves it. |
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Feb 6, 2021 22:13:30 GMT 1
You knew it was gonna happen with MIKE DEAN Worst Premier League ref I have to say, this last week proves it. there should be a time limit of 30 secs for any incident, if it isnt clear then umpires call the replays should only be initiated by the ref f he thinks hes seen something and wants to see it again or again like cricket, 3 appeals for each side i'd have liked to have seen the fulham player do what he did if ultimately he was responsible for a petty red card for the record i'd also like the goal line in front of the goal made about 10 inches wide to give the keeper a bit of leeway on penalties |
|
|
|
VAR again
Feb 6, 2021 23:13:02 GMT 1
via mobile
Post by Valerioch on Feb 6, 2021 23:13:02 GMT 1
No saving Varchester United this weekend. Tears for Pilch!
|
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Feb 6, 2021 23:17:38 GMT 1
No saving Varchester United this weekend. Tears for Pilch! you are mixed up varchester united play man city tomorrow i've had 2p on with betfair fabinhio 100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000/1 to get a red card |
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Feb 7, 2021 18:09:37 GMT 1
well well well
fabinho deliberate trip in the box
no card at all, no var review
keeper one foot off his line
no var review
no change there then
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
VAR again
Feb 7, 2021 18:15:53 GMT 1
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2021 18:15:53 GMT 1
well well well fabinho deliberate trip in the box no card at all, no var review keeper one foot off his line no var review no change there then Law 14 - Thr Penalty Kick: ‘When the ball is kicked, the defending goalkeeper must have at least part of one foot touching, or in line with, the goal line’. It’s not clear whether the people in charge of VAR know the rules, but it’s clear that you don’t |
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Feb 7, 2021 18:21:22 GMT 1
well well well fabinho deliberate trip in the box no card at all, no var review keeper one foot off his line no var review no change there then Law 14 - Thr Penalty Kick: ‘When the ball is kicked, the defending goalkeeper must have at least part of one foot touching, or in line with, the goal line’. It’s not clear whether the people in charge of VAR know the rules, but it’s clear that you don’t no defending the red card then ? the 2nd one of the half that should have been given after the planned attack on the gundog in the opening minute  |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
VAR again
Feb 7, 2021 18:29:08 GMT 1
via mobile
Post by Deleted on Feb 7, 2021 18:29:08 GMT 1
Law 14 - Thr Penalty Kick: ‘When the ball is kicked, the defending goalkeeper must have at least part of one foot touching, or in line with, the goal line’. It’s not clear whether the people in charge of VAR know the rules, but it’s clear that you don’t no defending the red card then ? the 2nd one of the half that should have been given after the planned attack on the gundog in the opening minute Not last man, not violent conduct, not a red card. Thank the Lord you’re not a VAR ref and we’re left with such talent of Dean and Mason  |
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Feb 7, 2021 18:41:17 GMT 1
Law 12 Where a player commits an offence against an opponent within their own penalty area which denies an opponent an obvious goal-scoring opportunity and the referee awards a penalty kick, the offending player is cautioned if the offence was an attempt to play the ball; in all other circumstances (e.g. holding, pulling, pushing, no possibility to play the ball etc.) the offending player must be sent off. try watching again with your eyes open |
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Feb 7, 2021 18:51:17 GMT 1
salah, shot by a sniper
|
|
|
|
Post by martinshrew on Feb 7, 2021 18:53:12 GMT 1
If that's enough contact to go down the game is gone.
|
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Feb 7, 2021 18:55:02 GMT 1
If that's enough contact to go down the game is gone. i expected the gundog to run and pick him up after he got shot |
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Feb 7, 2021 18:58:01 GMT 1
Fabinho, more lives than a really lucky cat
|
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Feb 7, 2021 19:02:02 GMT 1
ooops, alisson wanderland  |
|
|
|
VAR again
Feb 7, 2021 19:03:35 GMT 1
via mobile
Post by martinshrew on Feb 7, 2021 19:03:35 GMT 1
Justice done, except Fabinho should've seen 2x yellows.
|
|
|
|
Post by martinshrew on Feb 7, 2021 19:05:26 GMT 1
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
|
|
