Post by wiganshrew2 on Dec 14, 2004 13:29:11 GMT 1
Yesterday, I read, in The Liverpool Daily Post, an account of the match at the Diva.
Very biased, I thought.
According to them, Chester had a bad day, and should have easily demolished Shrewsbury who are (quote) "woefully inept and have only had four wins all season."
The penalty saved them- but, according to the "Post", Chester had plenty of chances and squandered them- but would have won easily if they had not been one man down.
Nobody used the word "Inept" on Radio shropshire's commentary- and Gary Peter's seemed quite pleased with the team's performance, on the whole.
Is the Liverpool daily Post biased, because of all the scousers who live in Chester?!!
Very biased, I thought.
According to them, Chester had a bad day, and should have easily demolished Shrewsbury who are (quote) "woefully inept and have only had four wins all season."
The penalty saved them- but, according to the "Post", Chester had plenty of chances and squandered them- but would have won easily if they had not been one man down.
Nobody used the word "Inept" on Radio shropshire's commentary- and Gary Peter's seemed quite pleased with the team's performance, on the whole.
Is the Liverpool daily Post biased, because of all the scousers who live in Chester?!!
