Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 14, 2014 21:11:34 GMT 1
Reports that he's resigned as Palace manager.
|
|
|
Post by Red Rose In Exile on Aug 14, 2014 21:17:44 GMT 1
|
|
Shrewsfan1985
The Loggerheads
Posts: 23,848
My first team is..: Shrewsbury
|
Post by Shrewsfan1985 on Aug 14, 2014 21:31:01 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by franthetownfan on Aug 14, 2014 21:41:29 GMT 1
Right after they signed Martin Kelly as well from Liverpool, who I always rated and personally I thought is far better than Glen Johnson, well, Cameron Gayle is better than Glen Johnson. I thought he was really loved there at CP, something is unfolding I'm sure that we just simple do not know about.
|
|
|
Post by mattmw on Aug 14, 2014 21:53:01 GMT 1
Seems like a clash of personalities between Pullis and the Palace chairman Parish over the clubs transfer policy.
Odd their chairman should take a stance that forced the manager out. Almost certain that without him they would now be in the Championship, but ended last season in great form and looked to have every chance to build on that this season
Big appointment for the chairman to replace him
|
|
|
Post by theshrews81 on Aug 14, 2014 22:12:09 GMT 1
Neil Lennon???
Plus some premier league managers will be nervous knowing Tony Pullis is available to replace them if they have a bad start
Sent from my GT-I9300 using proboards
|
|
|
Post by ThrobsBlackHat on Aug 14, 2014 22:27:08 GMT 1
Now that, is bonkers.
Dead certs to go down now.
|
|
|
Post by jamo on Aug 14, 2014 22:36:56 GMT 1
After his performance last season that has to rank as one of the craziest decisions in a long time. Pullis was made for taking an underachieving club onto a stronger footing. Palace to be relegated for me now.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 14, 2014 22:51:10 GMT 1
Malky Mackay favourite with the bookies, and would not surprise me.
Would give him a chance to re-unite with Iain Moody.
|
|
|
Post by TheFoz on Aug 14, 2014 23:13:46 GMT 1
It was a miracle that Palace managed to stay up and he achieved that with ease and guided them to a remarkable 11th place.
Bizarre, I'd give him everything he wanted as he would cement your place in The Premier League for sure.
I can only see Palace going down now, he will get a job somewhere else soon.
|
|
|
Post by Myddleshrew on Aug 15, 2014 1:16:21 GMT 1
Pulis is a legend his record speaks for its self
When he took over at Palace they were doomed he saved them and took them beyond a relagtion threatened side.
Before today I would not have tipped Palace for the trap door now Pulis has left they will NOT stay up.
Pulis for me was manager of season and Palace Chairman/ Board sould let him do what he wants
Mckay stay away cos this seems another egotastic board Lennon take it on your cherish it
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 15, 2014 17:44:06 GMT 1
Wales do a swap!you messed up last year now you've got a second chance Coleman for Palace.
|
|
|
Post by jonbond on Aug 15, 2014 18:18:12 GMT 1
Personally feel there are some ridiculous comments on here. Pulis did amazingly well last season , but for a club that has been in administration twice, the owner is right not to be held to ransom . Pulis wanted to rip up the wage structure and get players in on 40-60 k a week . He did the same at stoke , he's basically a cheque book mansger but a very good one .
|
|
|
Post by bobbytheblock19er on Aug 15, 2014 20:21:52 GMT 1
Personally feel there are some ridiculous comments on here. Pulis did amazingly well last season , but for a club that has been in administration twice, the owner is right not to be held to ransom . Pulis wanted to rip up the wage structure and get players in on 40-60 k a week . He did the same at stoke , he's basically a cheque book mansger but a very good one . harsh!
|
|
|
Post by pughywasfree on Aug 15, 2014 20:39:48 GMT 1
Personally feel there are some ridiculous comments on here. Pulis did amazingly well last season , but for a club that has been in administration twice, the owner is right not to be held to ransom . Pulis wanted to rip up the wage structure and get players in on 40-60 k a week . He did the same at stoke , he's basically a cheque book mansger but a very good one . harsh! but true?
|
|
|
Post by bobbytheblock19er on Aug 15, 2014 23:08:16 GMT 1
cant imagine any of those players he signed for Stoke were on 40-60k a week !pulis will be back in a job by November saving whoever is bottom at the time
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 15, 2014 23:31:54 GMT 1
Personally feel there are some ridiculous comments on here. Pulis did amazingly well last season , but for a club that has been in administration twice, the owner is right not to be held to ransom . Pulis wanted to rip up the wage structure and get players in on 40-60 k a week . He did the same at stoke , he's basically a cheque book mansger but a very good one . Same as Malky Mackay then! Two sides to every story, remember that!
|
|
|
Post by lenny on Aug 15, 2014 23:59:40 GMT 1
cant imagine any of those players he signed for Stoke were on 40-60k a week !pulis will be back in a job by November saving whoever is bottom at the time They were! The likes of Crouch and Palacios were big fees and big wages, Jones and Kitson a couple of others, too. He did a very good job at palace without spending the money, and is evidently a good motivator and coach. Not sure about his spending money (during his time at Stoke they had the 3rd highest net spend in the prem) though, so maybe Parish was right to stand his ground if Pulis was unrealistic. No denying he is a solid manager and did a fine job last season, but he isn't irreplaceable. Palace have a decent, if not exceptional squad and Stoke went on to record their highest ever finish under Hughes, who isn't exactly a revered manager. Claiming Palace are as good as relegated already with the likes of Leicester, Villa, WBA and Burnley all likely to struggle as well is perhaps a little OTT I feel.
|
|
|
Post by blazey on Aug 16, 2014 1:33:20 GMT 1
Don't understand the hype around Pulis.
The trade-off appears to be you get to retain your coveted Premier League status whilst watching the most utilitarian (read: s**te) football of all time that would appear unsophisticated even by Conference standards.
Just a thought...maybe Crystal Palace are better off in the Championship?
|
|
|
Post by stuttgartershrew on Aug 16, 2014 8:21:03 GMT 1
Don't understand the hype around Pulis. The trade-off appears to be you get to retain your coveted Premier League status whilst watching the most utilitarian (read: s****) football of all time that would appear unsophisticated even by Conference standards. Just a thought...maybe Crystal Palace are better off in the Championship? You might want to pop that on the Palace message board. Be interesting to see the response... I think Pulis gives you the chance to consolidate in the Premier League. That in itself is worth a fair bit in this day an age. Look at Stoke. He took them up and kept them up and now they are pretty well set as a Premier League side. I think plenty of clubs would be more than happy to take him and his brand of football for a time if it meant getting yourself established in the top flight. I think you have a point about his style of football, I think Stoke fans ultimately got board of it and then fancied a change. But I think most would agree that Pulis had a huge bearing on them being a pretty established Premier League side. I think he can give you the time needed for a club to acclimatize once they get to the top flight. Sure he won't be short of offers to get back into management...
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 16, 2014 10:51:30 GMT 1
Pulis a ''Chequebook manager'' . ''The Welsh Ancellotti''!! Stoke and Palace both will have had among the smallest budgets in the league while he was their.Stoke only subsequently got too spend what they have due to Pulis keeping them in the Premier League and qualifying for Europe. He is a Manager who gets the best out of what he's got and can identify those players that will work with what's already their and are willing to join Club's like Stoke and Palace. He's not stupid and if given the Wales job he will know the strengths of a Midfield with Ramsey,Bale,Ledley,Williams.His strengths are as motivator and someone who will ensure they defend better.Results are what really count those quoting ''expert pundits''or Managers who cannot counter his Tactics are talking bolloks
|
|
|
Post by Valerioch on Aug 16, 2014 11:00:55 GMT 1
Don't understand the hype around Pulis. The trade-off appears to be you get to retain your coveted Premier League status whilst watching the most utilitarian (read: s****) football of all time that would appear unsophisticated even by Conference standards. Just a thought...maybe Crystal Palace are better off in the Championship? Not true with regards to Crystal Palace's football under him. Stoke fair enough you're correct imo
|
|
|
Post by lenny on Aug 16, 2014 11:01:26 GMT 1
Palace also played some good stuff last year. Pacey counter attacks based on wide play, very different from Stoke.
|
|
|
Post by mattmw on Aug 16, 2014 13:29:42 GMT 1
Based in the first half of Man U v Swansea I'm sticking a fiver on Pulis being appointed as Man U boss in December to help them in their relegation battle
|
|
|
Post by atcham jack on Aug 16, 2014 16:11:02 GMT 1
how long before pulis goes to the hawthorns?
|
|
|
Post by ThrobsBlackHat on Aug 16, 2014 18:48:28 GMT 1
Don't understand the hype around Pulis. The trade-off appears to be you get to retain your coveted Premier League status whilst watching the most utilitarian (read: s****) football of all time that would appear unsophisticated even by Conference standards. Just a thought...maybe Crystal Palace are better off in the Championship? Ha ha, Bolasie and others terrorising the establishment with pace. If he's got Palace successful with long ball rubbish with Chamakh up front then he truly is a miracle worker!
|
|
|
Post by bobbytheblock19er on Aug 16, 2014 20:05:55 GMT 1
Don't understand the hype around Pulis. The trade-off appears to be you get to retain your coveted Premier League status whilst watching the most utilitarian (read: s****) football of all time that would appear unsophisticated even by Conference standards. Just a thought...maybe Crystal Palace are better off in the Championship? the hype is he took a team from bottom to 11th in months . What other manager can do that? Compare it to Harry Redknapp taking over qpr, and then got them relegated ? I am a big fan , purely because all these managers at Chelsea man city arsenal Liverpool have got great resources , training grounds , staff and s**t loads of money! And they are the ones that win manager of the season most of the time . Not being harsh but if you give anybody unlimited money they could guide you to a nice PL finishing position, unless of course you're David moyes
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 17, 2014 0:33:10 GMT 1
Don't understand the hype around Pulis. The trade-off appears to be you get to retain your coveted Premier League status whilst watching the most utilitarian (read: s****) football of all time that would appear unsophisticated even by Conference standards. Just a thought...maybe Crystal Palace are better off in the Championship? the hype is he took a team from bottom to 11th in months . What other manager can do that? Compare it to Harry Redknapp taking over qpr, and then got them relegated ? I am a big fan , purely because all these managers at Chelsea man city arsenal Liverpool have got great resources , training grounds , staff and s**t loads of money! And they are the ones that win manager of the season most of the time . Not being harsh but if you give anybody unlimited money they could guide you to a nice PL finishing position, unless of course you're David moyes Pulis did come in during September I think and didn't Redknapp go in during January? I agree though, Pulis is a top manager.
|
|
|
Post by bobbytheblock19er on Aug 18, 2014 23:48:40 GMT 1
Don't know if you can bet on this . But my money is on pulis to burnley by November . After what I saw of them tonight , they need him ..... And fast ! Bunch of hoofers .
|
|
|
Post by vanner on Aug 19, 2014 7:13:23 GMT 1
Don't know if you can bet on this . But my money is on pulis to burnley by November . After what I saw of them tonight , they need him ..... And fast ! Bunch of hoofers . I personally thought they gave a decent account of themselves against a Chelsea team who look mightily impressive and have improved quite a bit since last year. They were favourites for relegation last year so I'm sure the manager will get more time than November unless they haven't got a win by then or something.
|
|