|
Post by markglasgow on Jan 21, 2012 22:09:21 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by ianwhit on Jan 21, 2012 22:32:40 GMT 1
Having watched the incident back with the medical team i would advise you all watch it before commenting.
|
|
|
Post by jamo on Jan 21, 2012 22:38:57 GMT 1
Having watched the incident back with the medical team i would advise you all watch it before commenting. Why ?
|
|
|
Post by Feedo Gnasher on Jan 21, 2012 22:40:50 GMT 1
Having watched the incident back with the medical team i would advise you all watch it before commenting. Make it available to watch then
|
|
|
Post by ianwhit on Jan 21, 2012 22:40:56 GMT 1
Having watched the incident back with the medical team i would advise you all watch it before commenting. Why ? Watch the television later and tell me your thoughts, or that of your union.
|
|
|
Post by jamo on Jan 21, 2012 22:43:43 GMT 1
Watch the television later and tell me your thoughts, or that of your union. I'm not aware all of the union were there. You never did get the sarcasm thing right did you ? Anyway, why do we have to watch the television before having an opinion ?
|
|
|
Post by WindsorShrew on Jan 21, 2012 22:44:32 GMT 1
Watch the television later and tell me your thoughts, or that of your union. I'm glad you said Union and not Party....he doesn't have a party anymore they have upset him by being sensible,,,,
|
|
|
Post by mattmw on Jan 21, 2012 22:47:12 GMT 1
Having watched the incident back with the medical team i would advise you all watch it before commenting. How did the Morgan challenge look? Unlucky red or bit of a lunge as BBC are describing it?
|
|
|
Post by shrewsTRUST on Jan 21, 2012 22:47:19 GMT 1
Watch the television later and tell me your thoughts, or that of your union. I'm not aware all of the union were there. You never did get the sarcasm thing right did you ? Anyway, why do we have to watch the television before having an opinion ? I would imagine it has something to do with broadcasting rights...
|
|
|
Post by ianwhit on Jan 21, 2012 22:50:39 GMT 1
Watch the television later and tell me your thoughts, or that of your union. I'm not aware all of the union were there. You never did get the sarcasm thing right did you ? Anyway, why do we have to watch the television before having an opinion ? As an intelligent person i would expect you make your own opinion so i will allow you to do that. as an embracer of the union movement can you explain somthing to me, when i was a young fledgling computer operator on the yts i was a member of the union, i wanted to work the nightshifts to see the end of day processing but was not allowed to by the union as they were protecting the interests of their members?
|
|
|
Post by ianwhit on Jan 21, 2012 22:56:00 GMT 1
Having watched the incident back with the medical team i would advise you all watch it before commenting. How did the Morgan challenge look? Unlucky red or bit of a lunge as BBC are describing it? Haven't had time to look at.
|
|
|
Post by jamo on Jan 21, 2012 23:03:36 GMT 1
As an intelligent person i would expect you make your own opinion so i will allow you to do that. as an embracer of the union movement can you explain somthing to me, when i was a young fledgling computer operator on the yts i was a member of the union, i wanted to work the nightshifts to see the end of day processing but was not allowed to by the union as they were protecting the interests of their members? But surely we are able to equally form an opinion on something we have seen with our own eyes, comment upon it and then welcome the views of others ? As for your second question it's impossible to comment without knowing all the facts but I suspect it may have something to do with the sum of the parts .... and all that. i.e. by allowing an individual to do one thing may have an adverse effect on the benefits for many others. Or you were a scab.
|
|
|
Post by ianwhit on Jan 21, 2012 23:10:57 GMT 1
As an intelligent person i would expect you make your own opinion so i will allow you to do that. as an embracer of the union movement can you explain somthing to me, when i was a young fledgling computer operator on the yts i was a member of the union, i wanted to work the nightshifts to see the end of day processing but was not allowed to by the union as they were protecting the interests of their members? But surely we are able to equally form an opinion on something we have seen with our own eyes, comment upon it and then welcome the views of others ? As for your second question it's impossible to comment without knowing all the facts but I suspect it may have something to do with the sum of the parts .... and all that. i.e. by allowing an individual to do one thing may have an adverse effect on the benefits for many others. Or you were a scab. 1, of course you are, but would you also take a secondview of something before popping the black cap on. 2, Having worked at Townsend-Thoresen/P&O in the late 80's if you wish to call me a scab I would refer you to my special friend brain cant.
|
|
|
Post by alex1993 on Jan 21, 2012 23:14:30 GMT 1
whitty were you bullied in school as thats the only reason i can think of you being like you are..
|
|
|
Post by mattmw on Jan 21, 2012 23:14:54 GMT 1
How did the Morgan challenge look? Unlucky red or bit of a lunge as BBC are describing it? Haven't had time to look at. Drat going to have to stop up past my bed time to watch it on the beeb now!
|
|
|
Post by DaveG on Jan 21, 2012 23:15:17 GMT 1
The SCS incident, from where i was in block 5, looked like 2 players going full-bloodedly for the same ball. SCS was very brave and got there fractionally before Dickinson.
I personally did not think it was anything more than a foul caused by SCS's greater desire.
Some other people near me said that he was looking at Shane rather than the ball. That wasn't how it looked to me.
As for Morgan's, I didn't see it. I'll be interested to see FLR tonight.
|
|
|
Post by ianwhit on Jan 21, 2012 23:16:20 GMT 1
whitty were you bullied in school as thats the only reason i can think of you being like you are.. are you adam?
|
|
|
Post by jamo on Jan 21, 2012 23:18:16 GMT 1
1, of course you are, but would you also take a secondview of something before popping the black cap on. 2, Having worked at Townsend-Thoresen/P&O in the late 80's if you wish to call me a scab I would refer you to my special friend brain cant. 1. Upon appeal I would be prepared to review the incident and supporting evidence. 2. Any friend of Mr Cant is a friend of the trades union movement. I apologise for calling you a scab.
|
|
|
Post by alex1993 on Jan 21, 2012 23:18:24 GMT 1
go back to shrewschat where they kiss your ass instead of coming on here and making a prat of yourself
|
|
|
Post by ianwhit on Jan 21, 2012 23:20:41 GMT 1
1, of course you are, but would you also take a secondview of something before popping the black cap on. 2, Having worked at Townsend-Thoresen/P&O in the late 80's if you wish to call me a scab I would refer you to my special friend brain cant. 1. Upon appeal I would be prepared to review the incident and supporting evidence. 2. Any friend of Mr Cant is a friend of the trades union movement. I apologise for calling you a scab. 3, xxx
|
|
|
Post by ianwhit on Jan 21, 2012 23:21:19 GMT 1
go back to shrewschat where they kiss your ass instead of coming on here and making a prat of yourself Have you read the post from clive?
|
|
furymuso
Midland League Division One
Floreat Loggerheads
Posts: 303
|
Post by furymuso on Jan 22, 2012 0:04:20 GMT 1
Doesn't seem to be a very clever chap, does he? The abuse obviously is wrong but his reaction just makes him look like an idiot...
|
|
|
Post by thesensationaljt on Jan 22, 2012 0:08:08 GMT 1
I couldn't care less what he's twittered, or whatever you call it. He lost, and he's a clumsy thug.
|
|
|
Post by windsorjnr on Jan 22, 2012 3:28:28 GMT 1
As an intelligent person i would expect you make your own opinion so i will allow you to do that. as an embracer of the union movement can you explain somthing to me, when i was a young fledgling computer operator on the yts i was a member of the union, i wanted to work the nightshifts to see the end of day processing but was not allowed to by the union as they were protecting the interests of their members? But surely we are able to equally form an opinion on something we have seen with our own eyes, comment upon it and then welcome the views of others ? As for your second question it's impossible to comment without knowing all the facts but I suspect it may have something to do with the sum of the parts .... and all that. i.e. by allowing an individual to do one thing may have an adverse effect on the benefits for many others. Or you were a scab. Calm down, he'll make a statement about how you're not a 'real fan' if you're not careful.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 22, 2012 7:04:52 GMT 1
Having watched the incident back with the medical team i would advise you all watch it before commenting. It wasn't just the cansdell-sheriff incident though was it? From the moment Dickinson fouled Sharps you could see he was a donkey and would end up hurting someone. How he did not get a second yellow card for persistent fouling is totally beyond me and I just hope Dickinson, who has previous this season of being an unpleasant , doesn't get away with similar against anyone else and possibly hurt anyone else through his total incompetence!
|
|
|
Post by ianwhit on Jan 22, 2012 11:30:59 GMT 1
But surely we are able to equally form an opinion on something we have seen with our own eyes, comment upon it and then welcome the views of others ? As for your second question it's impossible to comment without knowing all the facts but I suspect it may have something to do with the sum of the parts .... and all that. i.e. by allowing an individual to do one thing may have an adverse effect on the benefits for many others. Or you were a scab. Calm down, he'll make a statement about how you're not a 'real fan' if you're not careful. When have I made a statement about people being 'real fans'?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jan 22, 2012 11:44:12 GMT 1
I'd wager that the vast majority of fouls are where a player goes in honestly thinking he can win the ball, but gets their too late.
Same with Dickinson's foul on SCS, not intentionally dirty, but marginally mis-timed, and resulted in a nasty injury for SCS.
Having been cautioned in the first half and then committing a further number of fouls I do think the Southend striker was very lucky to stay on the field.
Let's hope SCS makes a speedy recovery, he's had a fantastic season so far.
|
|
|
Post by northwestman on Jan 22, 2012 11:45:41 GMT 1
£750k for Dickinson! What the hell have Stockport done with the money? They are seriously broke.
|
|
|
Post by mrbunny on Jan 22, 2012 11:46:51 GMT 1
£750k for Dickinson! What the hell have Stockport done with the money? They are seriously broke. They got a big fee for Pilkington too, they were in serious debt but spent lots to get out of this league, serves them right really.
|
|
|
Post by shrewroo on Jan 22, 2012 11:49:19 GMT 1
You come across as awfully bitter on this thread whitters. I think you need yet another holiday to chill out owd lad.
|
|