abalshrew
Midland League Division Two
selpmis
Posts: 117
|
Post by abalshrew on Jul 27, 2010 11:18:43 GMT 1
Can this be for real - in the back ground of the picture for the fan who won the ground naming vote - i hope this is a bit of basic photoshopping.....
|
|
|
Post by onthetrain92 on Jul 27, 2010 11:21:12 GMT 1
yeah its been photoshopped by the looks and its awful
|
|
|
Post by Dancin on Jul 27, 2010 11:31:53 GMT 1
Can this be for real - in the back ground of the picture for the fan who won the ground naming vote - i hope this is a bit of basic photoshopping..... Link------> This photo?
|
|
|
Post by SouthStandShrew on Jul 27, 2010 11:35:24 GMT 1
Pathetic.
|
|
|
Post by SouthStandShrew on Jul 27, 2010 11:47:41 GMT 1
On second look I think that is the real sign!
|
|
|
Post by heavenlyshrew on Jul 27, 2010 11:50:04 GMT 1
On second look I think that is the real sign! It is a real sign that is why
|
|
|
Post by SouthStandShrew on Jul 27, 2010 11:51:55 GMT 1
Its as bad as that sign we did have at the front of the car park which looked like it was made by a child which was pulled and replaced after comments from fans.
|
|
|
Post by heavenlyshrew on Jul 27, 2010 12:00:27 GMT 1
To be fair it does not look so bad when you see it for real.
|
|
|
Post by monkee on Jul 27, 2010 12:03:06 GMT 1
i really cant understand what the problem is. its in the sponsors colours and typeface , what else would you expect?
|
|
|
Post by DaveG on Jul 27, 2010 12:03:51 GMT 1
I think it looks fine - what's the problem?
If we want the considerable money that comes from sponsorship of this kind, you have to accept that the sponsor might want their name somewhere near the ground.
|
|
|
Post by len on Jul 27, 2010 12:09:08 GMT 1
Can't see the problem with it myself.
|
|
|
Post by ianwhit on Jul 27, 2010 12:09:24 GMT 1
**** me it's going to be a long season!
|
|
|
Post by DaveG on Jul 27, 2010 12:11:12 GMT 1
**** me it's going to be a long season! Calm down Whitters - it is the usual suspects who are never gpoing to be happy - most fans a). appreciate the reasons for it, and b). think it looks fine. We'll find something really petty to complain about soon enough.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 27, 2010 12:12:47 GMT 1
It looks fine. What do we expect? A David Hockney masterpiece?
The most shoddy thing is they cannot get the name of the winning chap correct. Davies on the photo-Edwards in the article.
|
|
|
Post by PorkyShrew on Jul 27, 2010 12:14:58 GMT 1
**** me it's going to be a long season! your thinking mid table too are ya.....
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 27, 2010 12:27:26 GMT 1
i really cant understand what the problem is. its in the sponsors colours and typeface , what else would you expect? Monkee the " the Moaners Club" have to find something to feed their addiction!
|
|
|
Post by captainpike on Jul 27, 2010 12:29:49 GMT 1
What's the beef? This is a microcosm the kind of thing that's been putting me off going to games of late - just constant moaning. Moan, moan, moan, moan, moan. SHUT UP!
|
|
|
Post by Tux on Jul 27, 2010 12:59:08 GMT 1
Can't see the problem with it myself. Its as dull as it could possibly get.
|
|
|
Post by hooverfoxhat on Jul 27, 2010 13:05:50 GMT 1
Simple question - Why not use the same logo font for the naming of the stadium as that used on the shirts? I understand the reasoning for the naming etc etc but believe that the original Greenhous logo would look far better and more professional than just plain block lettering seen in the picture.
|
|
|
Post by SouthStandShrew on Jul 27, 2010 13:22:22 GMT 1
Simple question - Why not use the same logo font for the naming of the stadium as that used on the shirts? I understand the reasoning for the naming etc etc but believe that the original Greenhous logo would look far better and more professional than just plain block lettering seen in the picture. Fair point.
|
|
|
Post by SeanBroseley on Jul 27, 2010 13:26:13 GMT 1
hides clippy a little. Not all bad.
|
|
|
Post by Ned on Jul 27, 2010 13:29:49 GMT 1
I like it as well, seem SSS is looking to be negative before the season's even started.
|
|
|
Post by monkee on Jul 27, 2010 13:31:31 GMT 1
Simple question - Why not use the same logo font for the naming of the stadium as that used on the shirts? I understand the reasoning for the naming etc etc but believe that the original Greenhous logo would look far better and more professional than just plain block lettering seen in the picture. what are you on about? they are the same. both red capital italics
|
|
|
Post by hooverfoxhat on Jul 27, 2010 13:58:12 GMT 1
Simple question - Why not use the same logo font for the naming of the stadium as that used on the shirts? I understand the reasoning for the naming etc etc but believe that the original Greenhous logo would look far better and more professional than just plain block lettering seen in the picture. what are you on about? they are the same. both red capital italics Look at the Greenhous logo on the shirts with the blue flashes above and below - I don't see that/them on the sign and they add to what would be and is an otherwise vey bland sponsors hoarding, add those to the brand name and it becomes a little more identifiable and stand out.
|
|
|
Post by SouthStandShrew on Jul 27, 2010 14:05:26 GMT 1
I like it as well, seem SSS is looking to be negative before the season's even started. Ned, Don't you support Cardiff City too?
|
|
|
Post by timgallon on Jul 27, 2010 14:07:00 GMT 1
The sign looked at last night with the lighting behind the words.
|
|
|
Post by captainpike on Jul 27, 2010 14:07:14 GMT 1
Look at the Greenhous logo on the shirts with the blue flashes above and below - I don't see that/them on the sign and they add to what would be and is an otherwise vey bland sponsors hoarding, add those to the brand name and it becomes a little more identifiable and stand out. I think it's a good thing that it's low-key, I don't want corporate branding all over the stadium!
|
|
|
Post by mrmagoo on Jul 27, 2010 14:09:34 GMT 1
**** me it's going to be a long season! I don't envy you this season Ian..... Moaning about the new sponsors sign, the new kit, the badge, the iron!,the manager, the lack of signings, the £125 kit, the fans you sit by, the fashion show, the pre season games and we haven't even kicked off yet!!!!!!.. Good luck, don't forget you're tin hat!!
|
|
|
Post by monkee on Jul 27, 2010 14:12:16 GMT 1
Look at the Greenhous logo on the shirts with the blue flashes above and below - I don't see that/them on the sign and they add to what would be and is an otherwise vey bland sponsors hoarding, add those to the brand name and it becomes a little more identifiable and stand out. I think it's a good thing that it's low-key, I don't want corporate branding all over the stadium! agreed and if the flashes had been on there , it would have been too gawdy, if they arent its too plain. some people just look for faults to make a fuss about. its a tiny issue, far more importnt things going on.
|
|
|
Post by ianwhit on Jul 27, 2010 14:23:43 GMT 1
**** me it's going to be a long season! I don't envy you this season Ian..... Moaning about the new sponsors sign, the new kit, the badge, the iron!,the manager, the lack of signings, the £125 kit, the fans you sit by, the fashion show, the pre season games and we haven't even kicked off yet!!!!!!.. Good luck, don't forget you're tin hat!! Any sane person wouldn't even read this s**te
|
|