|
Post by kickinpretty on Feb 22, 2004 1:17:53 GMT 1
Lee, you admitted that you had been messaged with the details of the alledged offender, you then gave clues as to his identity, you even spelt out his name in stars and placed a picture of an animal, which basically revealed who it was.
Im sorry Lee if you think that that is ok, but it isnt and cant be defended.
You should not have been told who it was as its against the law, and you should not have revealed or hinted to this board who it was.
I think that the post was well out of order on Buckschat but nobody except the ISP can prove what computer was used - No one can prove who actually posted, the fact that somebody has mentioned that it is a work computer that the message was posted from means that there is a very high chance this person didnt actually do anything wrong.
This is why it was wrong of you to give the game away, also, do you not think it a little sinister that his phone number was being offered about? For what purpose was this being done?
|
|
|
Post by LeeTUFC on Feb 22, 2004 1:26:15 GMT 1
i spelt out his name in stars?! where are on earth did i do that?? i never once revealed anything about his name, yes i put a pic on for about 1 minute then removed it. and dont you think that re iterating the clues now that not just me but jp did aswell may start giving it away to the majority of people who didnt see it? and about the telephone number - ITS NOY MY PROBLEM OR MY FAULT - yes its wrong to search it out that is why i dont know it and when asked if i wanted it and i said no as to me his post on bucks chat calling me a tw@t was quite funny. why all this sticking uo for him so much? that interesting in the goodness of the law? or perhaps you know the person maybe im bored of this subject, enjoy the thread (and yes i am a seedless jaffa tw@t )
|
|
|
Post by kickinpretty on Feb 22, 2004 1:34:57 GMT 1
Sorry Lee but i dont know who he is, what i do know is that revealing information submitted as part of registration should not be divulged to any other person except other moderators or the relevant authorities.
It should also not be revealed to other users of the board under any circumstances.
Its basic privacy and as a user of this board and others you should be concerned too.
I couldnt give a monkeys about the accused to be honest, but i do care about my privacy and the privacy of others and the general rule of thumb in this country that you are INNOCENT untill proven guilty.
|
|
|
Post by LeeTUFC on Feb 22, 2004 1:35:05 GMT 1
im not admin so cant remove it - dont draw attention to it and itll move into obscurity - our admin is crap and never does anything - ill enquire if i can become a mod on there
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Feb 22, 2004 1:36:29 GMT 1
i still don't know who posted on here naming the 'suspect'
i was given the ip of the barry tuffin and gave back the b&a user whos ip matched it
i also asked them not to post it
i posted a fao barry tuffin and also sent a pm to this user explaining the situation and if it was him could he rectify it
as far as i am aware this user has not logged in since and had chance of his say
in hindsight i should not have trusted the person i gave the details to
and maybe if buckschat had deleted the thread instead of replying to it and banned the ip and mailed us the details then there wouldn't have been a big fuss
the post certainly wouldn't have lived long on b&a
|
|
|
Post by LeeTUFC on Feb 22, 2004 1:39:20 GMT 1
hence my msg on mods on buckschat. ill see what i can do
|
|
|
Post by kickinpretty on Feb 22, 2004 1:45:31 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by LeeTUFC on Feb 22, 2004 1:50:30 GMT 1
I DID NOT DISCLOSE HIS NAME ON HERE - one pic for one minute, thats all
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Feb 22, 2004 1:54:48 GMT 1
thats what gary glitter said
|
|
|
Post by shrewsbadger on Feb 23, 2004 21:55:40 GMT 1
I have just read my message from Pilch and can categorically say I'm not really sure what is being spoken about! As for calling someone a dog. That is not my style! I don't understand why any of this has been attributed to me? Must be said I don't understand what ip address' are all about, but if it can be traced back to here, there are over 300 people working here, most of whom have internet access. and indeed many of whom would have direct access to my pc. and might even find it amusing to direct abusive messages on the blue and amber site. I hope no-one has got carried away and got the police involved or contacted my work directly but if they have I will have to prove my innocence internally. Would just be a shame if I have to stop using this message board because of it. I have been involved in some banter on this site, but as far as I'm aware I've never caused any real upset and the things I've said have always been very ! Where would I find the apparent problem messages that I am supposed to have written? I posted a lot on Friday about my dislike of Darby, but am not aware of anything else that might have caused offence. It is odd because I feel the need to apoligise, but have nothing to apoligise for. Grant
|
|
|
Post by El Huracán!!!! on Feb 23, 2004 22:03:48 GMT 1
Well this is gonna either put an end to this whole sorry saga or kick it of big time again!!!!!!
I think that there it has a ways to run yet!!!
|
|
|
Post by LeeTUFC on Feb 23, 2004 22:08:58 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by shrewsbadger on Feb 23, 2004 22:13:11 GMT 1
The first I knew of all this was about 40 minutes ago! I have logged on this morning but didn't read my message from Pilch and didn't go scrolling back and find this thread either. Quite honestly it is all a little bit over my head and don't really understand what is going on! but it sounds like I might well have a visit from my boss in the morning and will have to explain why I have been logging on to chat sites while at work. As for people having found my phone number, by all means give me a call, but I can again say that I catogorically did not call anyone a dog or threaten anyone with stabbing them!
Call me old fashioned but I'm actually feeling a bit disturbed by the whole thing, and think it might be better if I stayed off for a while, which is upsetting as I didn't do anything.
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Feb 23, 2004 22:21:05 GMT 1
I have just read my message from Pilch and can categorically say I'm not really sure what is being spoken about! As for calling someone a dog. That is not my style! I don't understand why any of this has been attributed to me? Must be said I don't understand what ip address' are all about, but if it can be traced back to here, there are over 300 people working here, most of whom have internet access. and indeed many of whom would have direct access to my pc. and might even find it amusing to direct abusive messages on the blue and amber site. I hope no-one has got carried away and got the police involved or contacted my work directly but if they have I will have to prove my innocence internally. Would just be a shame if I have to stop using this message board because of it. I have been involved in some banter on this site, but as far as I'm aware I've never caused any real upset and the things I've said have always been very ! Where would I find the apparent problem messages that I am supposed to have written? I posted a lot on Friday about my dislike of Darby, but am not aware of anything else that might have caused offence. It is odd because I feel the need to apoligise, but have nothing to apoligise for. Grant thank you shrewsbadger explanation accepted someone really did get upset at the message and the ip info was exchanged with buckschat (in confidence) not sure who posted your name on here but they owe you an apology maybe if you could spread a warning around at your place of work it will prevent any future potential trouble last thing we want is any confrontations or old bill being involved cheers pilch
|
|
|
Post by shrewsbadger on Feb 23, 2004 22:36:10 GMT 1
Pilch To be fair Pilch I'm not too upset at my name being given out. It's more the fact that I feel I have been condemed without a chance of defending myself and even in doing so feel it is pretty lame of me to just say it wasn't me. But thats all I can do, there is very little I can do to prove I didn't do it.
I just hope that the fact that I have been posting on here for some time now without causing to much offence can help persuade people that it wasn't me!
So to Lee and Jules and anyone else who was offended by the articles I'd once again like to say I didn't write them, but am sorry that there are such idiots out there who like to offend and hurt.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2004 22:37:24 GMT 1
Cheers for posting Shrewsbadger.
|
|
|
Post by LeeTUFC on Feb 23, 2004 22:48:34 GMT 1
So to Lee and Jules and anyone else who was offended by the articles I'd once again like to say I didn't write them, but am sorry that there are such idiots out there who like to offend and hurt. shrewsbadger - if you didnt write it as you have said you didnt then there is no need to apologise for the other idiots around. the comment about jules did p**s me off but what was said about me was brilliant comedy value, hence my sarcastic reply the way your name got put on here was because me and JP were having a laugh giving clues out - i wasnt taking it seriously at this point and agree that perhaps we shouldnt of continued untill you had your say - i also rejected the chance to have ur phone number as i really wasnt to bothered. the thread im on about got deleted and the person who named you only did because of me and JP milking it for laughs may i now suggest you find the w****r at ur workplace who has been messing with your pc lee
|
|
|
Post by MRJPSHREW on Feb 23, 2004 22:49:22 GMT 1
Yes Lee's right I suspect me and him trying to make light of it possibly made it worse and if thats the case Im sorry.
Thats a hazard that comes with posting at work I suppose..someone else can cause you some hassle. Lets just hope this is coming to the end of this now and we can get on with talking football.
And Pancakes!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 23, 2004 22:51:25 GMT 1
Let this be a lesson to all regarding accusations based on ip addresses.
|
|
|
Post by telfordSHREWS on Feb 23, 2004 22:55:59 GMT 1
Not so long back "Petetheloon" went to lunch and came back finding out workmates had messed with his PC, let this be a warning to people who work with large groups, log out if in doubt.
|
|
|
Post by telfordSHREWS on Feb 23, 2004 22:58:34 GMT 1
Jpee is a horrible and terrible mon, i dont like him in the slytest, Pilch is a playboy luv im loads.
|
|
|
Post by telfordSHREWS on Feb 23, 2004 23:00:14 GMT 1
god i leave my PC for 2 mins and Mrs Telford_Shrews takes over , i would to apoligise for the last post to all concerned.
|
|
|
Post by MRJPSHREW on Feb 23, 2004 23:04:57 GMT 1
Typical blonde
|
|
|
Post by El Huracán!!!! on Feb 23, 2004 23:08:05 GMT 1
Aint it typical Jp does all the hard work and Phich gets the fans ;D
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Feb 23, 2004 23:50:28 GMT 1
i had a bizzare pm from mrs telford shrew not long ago, is she a weather forecaster ? she told me the coast would be clear tomorrow night between 7pm and 10 pm
|
|
|
Post by Flixton_shrew on Feb 24, 2004 0:02:36 GMT 1
Thats the funniest post of the day, Pilch !! ;D
|
|
|
Post by gregtheshrew on Feb 24, 2004 0:04:43 GMT 1
Did i miss some scandal?
|
|
|
Post by telfordSHREWS on Feb 24, 2004 0:09:10 GMT 1
i had a bizzare pm from mrs telford shrew not long ago, is she a weather forecaster ? she told me the coast would be clear tomorrow night between 7pm and 10 pm Your having a laugh aint ya Pilch , she told me its going to very blowy, a little wet , and then stormy night ahead.
|
|
|
Post by mysticmurray on Feb 24, 2004 0:13:27 GMT 1
beans for dinner?
|
|
|
Post by gregtheshrew on Feb 24, 2004 0:16:05 GMT 1
I can safely say it wasn't me.My nan dying is slightly more important than posting abusive tripe on a website.
|
|