|
Post by martinshrew on Jan 1, 2024 21:21:15 GMT 1
That's a shocker of a decision, rode the contact then dived. Unbelievable.
|
|
|
Post by martinshrew on Jan 1, 2024 21:22:41 GMT 1
Justice.
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Jan 1, 2024 21:27:27 GMT 1
I just think there should have been a red card somewhere ;-)
|
|
|
Post by martinshrew on Jan 1, 2024 22:45:38 GMT 1
That's the worst dive I've ever seen.
**** me, what's the point in VAR?
|
|
|
Post by jamo on Jan 1, 2024 22:49:29 GMT 1
I can understand the Ref giving that in real time, but VAR should be ashamed of themselves
|
|
|
Post by martinshrew on Jan 1, 2024 22:50:47 GMT 1
I can understand the Ref giving that in real time, but VAR should be ashamed of themselves It's an absolute disgrace.
|
|
|
Post by Valerioch on Jan 1, 2024 22:56:55 GMT 1
That was one of the most one sided, dominant football games and performances you are ever likely to see, at any level
Newcastle well out of their depth
|
|
|
Post by gainsparkshrew on Jan 1, 2024 22:59:45 GMT 1
That was one of the most one sided, dominant football games and performances you are ever likely to see, at any level Newcastle well out of their depth I agree with your summary but TBF some appalling referee/var decisions
|
|
|
Post by chirkshrew on Jan 1, 2024 23:04:10 GMT 1
That was the most one sided VAR game of this season!!!!👍🤣😂🤣🥳🥳🎉
|
|
|
Post by Valerioch on Jan 1, 2024 23:06:41 GMT 1
That was the most one sided VAR game of this season!!!!👍🤣😂🤣🥳🥳🎉 Yes - if only VAR could look at yellow cards too, Joelinton would’ve been taking an early bath. How Taylor didn’t send him off for 2 yellow I’ll never know Appalling referee
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Jan 1, 2024 23:08:19 GMT 1
I fell asleep after 10 mins and woke up right at the end , at least my other bet of 2 goals each 4+ booking put me In profit even if the result didn't go the way I want
|
|
|
Post by martinshrew on Jan 1, 2024 23:18:57 GMT 1
That was the most one sided VAR game of this season!!!!👍🤣😂🤣🥳🥳🎉 Yes - if only VAR could look at yellow cards too, Joelinton would’ve been taking an early bath. How Taylor didn’t send him off for 2 yellow I’ll never know Appalling referee I'd say not pulling it back to book Joelinton was the only Liverpool decision he got wrong. For us on the other hand, Jesus wept them pens were bad, the second one is just inexcusable. In terms of one sided games, it was; although I think the performance from Liverpool against Man United was more one sided personally. Nunez & Anthony are in their own league of who can be the worst signing of the season, though at least Nunez has the right attitude and better temperament.
|
|
|
Post by chirkshrew on Jan 1, 2024 23:25:17 GMT 1
Liverpool will deffo miss Salah for a month.......can't really rely on the others to score the goals for them...... We'll see tho🤷🤷
|
|
|
Post by Feedo Gnasher on Jan 2, 2024 10:17:35 GMT 1
Yes - if only VAR could look at yellow cards too, Joelinton would’ve been taking an early bath. How Taylor didn’t send him off for 2 yellow I’ll never know Appalling referee I'd say not pulling it back to book Joelinton was the only Liverpool decision he got wrong. For us on the other hand, Jesus wept them pens were bad, the second one is just inexcusable. In terms of one sided games, it was; although I think the performance from Liverpool against Man United was more one sided personally. Nunez & Anthony are in their own league of who can be the worst signing of the season, though at least Nunez has the right attitude and better temperament. I know Nunez divides opinion but he does sometimes score and assist, absolutely slanderous to put him, or any other player even close to Antony! Ten Haag should be sacked for that signing alone.
|
|
|
Post by martinshrew on Jan 2, 2024 10:26:32 GMT 1
I'd say not pulling it back to book Joelinton was the only Liverpool decision he got wrong. For us on the other hand, Jesus wept them pens were bad, the second one is just inexcusable. In terms of one sided games, it was; although I think the performance from Liverpool against Man United was more one sided personally. Nunez & Anthony are in their own league of who can be the worst signing of the season, though at least Nunez has the right attitude and better temperament. I know Nunez divides opinion but he does sometimes score and assist, absolutely slanderous to put him, or any other player even close to Antony! Ten Haag should be sacked for that signing alone. Anthony is absolutely dreadful. Can't think of many worse PL imports at that price.
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Jan 4, 2024 22:38:22 GMT 1
slow motion sways the VAR again, very harsh I say
Henderson playing well for palace, so far anyway
0-0 80 mins
|
|
|
Post by chirkshrew on Jan 4, 2024 23:42:01 GMT 1
Bit harsh..... suppose his foot was up a little bit,and showing his studs.....ref going by guidelines,can understand dyche going nuts tho
|
|
|
Post by LetchworthShrew on Jan 9, 2024 20:17:07 GMT 1
Bit harsh..... suppose his foot was up a little bit,and showing his studs.....ref going by guidelines,can understand dyche going nuts tho and the FA have overturned it today www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/67922687
|
|
|
Post by chirkshrew on Jan 9, 2024 20:31:51 GMT 1
Ah that's good news👍👍
|
|
|
Post by venceremos on Jan 9, 2024 21:14:26 GMT 1
Bit harsh..... suppose his foot was up a little bit,and showing his studs.....ref going by guidelines,can understand dyche going nuts tho and the FA have overturned it today www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/67922687Quite right too. However, that reflects very badly on Chris Kavanagh, who agreed to overturn his original decision, and Michael Salisbury, who sat in his little box and saw fit to tell Kavanagh he'd made a mistake that nobody else had seen at the time or afterwards. The set up is all wrong. The on-field ref should call on VAR if he thinks it's needed, not be second guessed by someone wanting to get involved from miles away. If the ref doesn't call on VAR, so be it. If he gets a lot of decisions wrong the assessor's report will pick up on it. Let's have more spontaneity and less reliance on technology. We know all too well where that can lead!
|
|
|
Post by jamo on Jan 9, 2024 22:12:06 GMT 1
The set up is all wrong. The on-field ref should call on VAR if he thinks it's needed, not be second guessed by someone wanting to get involved from miles away. If the ref doesn't call on VAR, so be it. If he gets a lot of decisions wrong the assessor's report will pick up on it. Let's have more spontaneity and less reliance on technology. We know all too well where that can lead! I think that’s right. They need to change the emphasis of VAR to it being more an aide to the on-field referee and not method of correction/ interference. I would also look at the option of each captain having a number of reviews available to them each game , say 2 eg
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Jan 9, 2024 22:19:53 GMT 1
Bit harsh..... suppose his foot was up a little bit,and showing his studs.....ref going by guidelines,can understand dyche going nuts tho and the FA have overturned it today www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/67922687I think the solution is simple, 5 judges or more, all in separate booths, they get to see the incident but not the refs decision, they vote and majority decision is given on the pitch, stats can be collated and those who are clearly biased will be shown up and kicked off, I could organise this myself given the opportunity, its not hard, its kind of what happened in boxing after olympic corruption whatever year it was
|
|
|
Post by venceremos on Jan 10, 2024 13:29:45 GMT 1
I think the solution is simple, 5 judges or more, all in separate booths, they get to see the incident but not the refs decision, they vote and majority decision is given on the pitch, stats can be collated and those who are clearly biased will be shown up and kicked off, I could organise this myself given the opportunity, its not hard, its kind of what happened in boxing after olympic corruption whatever year it was It takes too long with one VAR official (or should I say second ref, as that's what they now seem to be). We'd be waiting 10 minutes for a decision from a panel of judges! If VAR can't be used sensibly (and it hasn't been so far) there's a much simpler solution. Bin it.
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Jan 10, 2024 13:36:40 GMT 1
I think the solution is simple, 5 judges or more, all in separate booths, they get to see the incident but not the refs decision, they vote and majority decision is given on the pitch, stats can be collated and those who are clearly biased will be shown up and kicked off, I could organise this myself given the opportunity, its not hard, its kind of what happened in boxing after olympic corruption whatever year it was It takes too long with one VAR official (or should I say second ref, as that's what they now seem to be). We'd be waiting 10 minutes for a decision from a panel of judges! If VAR can't be used sensibly (and it hasn't been so far) there's a much simpler solution. Bin it. why would it take longer ? it could take 30 secs, show them 3 angles and then they have to chose or abstain, simple really, no on pitch screens, no lengthy chat, certainly no persuasive comments , no swaying with the ref, 30 secs make your own mind up , either its refs call or ref is told to reverse decision
|
|
|
Post by venceremos on Jan 10, 2024 13:41:38 GMT 1
It takes too long with one VAR official (or should I say second ref, as that's what they now seem to be). We'd be waiting 10 minutes for a decision from a panel of judges! If VAR can't be used sensibly (and it hasn't been so far) there's a much simpler solution. Bin it. why would it take longer ? it could take 30 secs, show them 3 angles and then they have to chose or abstain, simple really, no on pitch screens, no lengthy chat, certainly no persuasive comments , no swaying with the ref, 30 secs make your own mind up , either its refs call or ref is told to reverse decision Thirty seconds? Dream on. It would take at least that long to get the pictures up. If it's that simple why bother with a ref at all? Let's turn football into the X Factor and have the judges decide! Or eliminate the humans and let AI take over.
|
|
|
Post by Pilch on Jan 10, 2024 13:47:33 GMT 1
why would it take longer ? it could take 30 secs, show them 3 angles and then they have to chose or abstain, simple really, no on pitch screens, no lengthy chat, certainly no persuasive comments , no swaying with the ref, 30 secs make your own mind up , either its refs call or ref is told to reverse decision Thirty seconds? Dream on. It would take at least that long to get the pictures up. If it's that simple why bother with a ref at all? Let's turn football into the X Factor and have the judges decide! Or eliminate the humans and let AI take over. even if it did, add 30 secs on , so all done and dusted fair and square in 60 secs ;-)
|
|
|
Post by tarporleyblue on Jan 15, 2024 18:19:35 GMT 1
|
|
|
Post by chirkshrew on Jan 15, 2024 20:00:15 GMT 1
Yep....and admitted the breach🤷...... probably get fined this time tho....but should be another 10 PTS🤷
|
|
|
Post by cabanas2017 on Jan 15, 2024 20:10:08 GMT 1
Everton Football Club acknowledges the Premier League's decision to refer a breach of Profit & Sustainability rules (PSR) for the assessment period ending with the 2022/23 season to an independent Premier League commission. This relates to a period which covers seasons 2019/20, 2020/21, 2021/22 and 2022/23. It therefore includes financial periods (2019/20, 2020/21 and 2021/22) for which the Club has already received a 10-point sanction. The Club is currently appealing that sanction. The Premier League does not have guidelines which prevent a club being sanctioned for alleged breaches in financial periods which have already been subject to punishment, unlike other governing bodies, including the EFL. As a result - and because of the Premier League's new commitment to deal with such matters "in-season" - the Club is in a position where it has had no option but to submit a PSR calculation which remains subject to change, pending the outcome of the appeal. The Club must now defend another Premier League complaint which includes the very same financial periods for which it has already been sanctioned, before that appeal has even been heard. The Club takes the view that this results from a clear deficiency in the Premier League's rules. Everton can assure its fans that it will continue to defend its position during the ongoing appeal and, should it be required to do so, at any future commission - and that the impact on supporters will be reflected as part of that process.
|
|
|
Post by servernaside on Jan 15, 2024 20:23:35 GMT 1
Surely all these complaints and allegations should be assessed at one time, not some relentless drip feed with random punishments administered in a piecemeal fashion.
|
|